These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29907419)

  • 1. Comparison of Breast Density Between Synthesized Versus Standard Digital Mammography.
    Haider I; Morgan M; McGow A; Stein M; Rezvani M; Freer P; Hu N; Fajardo L; Winkler N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1430-1436. PubMed ID: 29907419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
    Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
    Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
    Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Our experience using synthesized mammography vs full field digital mammography in population-based screening.
    Ahmadinejad N; Rasoulighasemlouei S; Rostamzadeh N; Arian A; Mohajeri A; Miratashi Yazdi SN
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2023; 10():100475. PubMed ID: 36647512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.
    Zuley ML; Guo B; Catullo VJ; Chough DM; Kelly AE; Lu AH; Rathfon GY; Lee Spangler M; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Bandos AI
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):664-71. PubMed ID: 24475859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
    Kilic P; Sendur HN; Gultekin S; Gultekin II; Cindil E; Cerit M
    Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 191(4):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 34472041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
    Alshafeiy TI; Wadih A; Nicholson BT; Rochman CM; Peppard HR; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W36-W41. PubMed ID: 28504593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
    Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
    Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Mass Size Measurements: Synthesized Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Şendur HN; Cerit MN; Gültekin S; Cindil E; Kılıç P
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 31537507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is There a Difference in the Diagnostic Outcomes of Calcifications Initially Identified on Synthetic Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening?
    Zhu H; Polat D; Evans P; Mootz A; Blackburn T; Xi Y; Dogan BE
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 133():109365. PubMed ID: 33142193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between cone-beam breast-CT and full-field digital mammography for microcalcification detection depending on breast density.
    Wienbeck S; Andrijevska V; Kück F; Perske C; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Fischer U; Lotz J; Kunze M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jun; 102(22):e33900. PubMed ID: 37266644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
    Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers.
    Choi WJ; Kim HH; Lee SY; Chae EY; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Son BH; Ahn SH; Choi YW
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Nov; 23(6):886-892. PubMed ID: 26534858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple Angulated Mammography Reconstructions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Diagnosis of Microcalcifications - Added Value to Standard Stack Reconstructions and Synthesized Mammography.
    Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Wicklein J; Mertelmeier T; Windfuhr-Blum M; Langer M
    Rofo; 2018 May; 190(5):433-440. PubMed ID: 29390228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.