229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29908349)
1. MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative kurtosis value and diffusion coefficient.
Shen L; Zhou G; Tang F; Lin Y; Zhou J; Lv P; Wang Y; Zong G; Zhao J
Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():44-56. PubMed ID: 29908349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Performance of Monoexponential DWI Versus Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Si Y; Liu RB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):358-368. PubMed ID: 29812977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.
Jiang JX; Tang ZH; Zhong YF; Qiang JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 27758016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion kurtosis imaging does not improve differentiation performance of breast lesions in a short clinical protocol.
Palm T; Wenkel E; Ohlmeyer S; Janka R; Uder M; Weiland E; Bickelhaupt S; Ladd ME; Zaitsev M; Hensel B; Laun FB
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():205-216. PubMed ID: 31425816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion kurtosis imaging of the liver at 3 Tesla: in vivo comparison to standard diffusion-weighted imaging.
Budjan J; Sauter EA; Zoellner FG; Lemke A; Wambsganss J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 28454487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging for malignant and benign pulmonary nodule differentiation: a preliminary study.
Das SK; Yang DJ; Wang JL; Zhang C; Yang HF
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 27055919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of diffusion kurtosis imaging in characterization of breast lesions.
Christou A; Ghiatas A; Priovolos D; Veliou K; Bougias H
Br J Radiol; 2017 May; 90(1073):20160873. PubMed ID: 28383279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors: A correlation with Ki-67 expression.
Li HM; Zhao SH; Qiang JW; Zhang GF; Feng F; Ma FH; Li YA; Gu WY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Nov; 46(5):1499-1506. PubMed ID: 28295854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative assessment of diffusion kurtosis imaging depicting deep myometrial invasion: a comparative analysis with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Song JC; Lu SS; Zhang J; Liu XS; Luo CY; Chen T
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2020 Mar; 26(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 32071025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.
Suo ST; Chen XX; Fan Y; Wu LM; Yao QY; Cao MQ; Liu Q; Xu JR
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 24833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of diffusion kurtosis imaging to odontogenic lesions: Analysis of the cystic component.
Sakamoto J; Kuribayashi A; Kotaki S; Fujikura M; Nakamura S; Kurabayashi T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1565-1571. PubMed ID: 27185307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of breast lesions using diffusion kurtosis model-based imaging: An initial experience.
Zhou WP; Zan XY; Hu XY; Liu X; Sudarshan SKP; Yang SD; Guo YJ; Fang XM
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):157-169. PubMed ID: 31815728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MRI for the assessment of prostate cancer: preliminary results.
Quentin M; Pentang G; Schimmöller L; Kott O; Müller-Lutz A; Blondin D; Arsov C; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Wittsack HJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):880-5. PubMed ID: 24848289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer.
Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD
Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusional kurtosis imaging in head and neck cancer: On the use of trace-weighted images to estimate indices of non-Gaussian water diffusion.
Marzi S; Minosse S; Vidiri A; Piludu F; Giannelli M
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5411-5419. PubMed ID: 30317646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
