BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

620 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29908362)

  • 1. Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography Analysis of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Participants.
    Hsu C; Caussy C; Imajo K; Chen J; Singh S; Kaulback K; Le MD; Hooker J; Tu X; Bettencourt R; Yin M; Sirlin CB; Ehman RL; Nakajima A; Loomba R
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 17(4):630-637.e8. PubMed ID: 29908362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic Resonance Elastography vs Transient Elastography in Detection of Fibrosis and Noninvasive Measurement of Steatosis in Patients With Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Park CC; Nguyen P; Hernandez C; Bettencourt R; Ramirez K; Fortney L; Hooker J; Sy E; Savides MT; Alquiraish MH; Valasek MA; Rizo E; Richards L; Brenner D; Sirlin CB; Loomba R
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Feb; 152(3):598-607.e2. PubMed ID: 27911262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 2D Shear Wave Elastography, Transient Elastography, and MR Elastography for the Diagnosis of Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Furlan A; Tublin ME; Yu L; Chopra KB; Lippello A; Behari J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):W20-W26. PubMed ID: 31714842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography.
    Imajo K; Kessoku T; Honda Y; Tomeno W; Ogawa Y; Mawatari H; Fujita K; Yoneda M; Taguri M; Hyogo H; Sumida Y; Ono M; Eguchi Y; Inoue T; Yamanaka T; Wada K; Saito S; Nakajima A
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Mar; 150(3):626-637.e7. PubMed ID: 26677985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis.
    Singh S; Venkatesh SK; Loomba R; Wang Z; Sirlin C; Chen J; Yin M; Miller FH; Low RN; Hassanein T; Godfrey EM; Asbach P; Murad MH; Lomas DJ; Talwalkar JA; Ehman RL
    Eur Radiol; 2016 May; 26(5):1431-40. PubMed ID: 26314479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Obesity and Discordance in Fibrosis Stage Determination by Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography in Patients With Nonalcoholic Liver Disease.
    Caussy C; Chen J; Alquiraish MH; Cepin S; Nguyen P; Hernandez C; Yin M; Bettencourt R; Cachay ER; Jayakumar S; Fortney L; Hooker J; Sy E; Valasek MA; Rizo E; Richards L; Brenner DA; Sirlin CB; Ehman RL; Loomba R
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Dec; 16(12):1974-1982.e7. PubMed ID: 29104128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liver stiffness accuracy by magnetic resonance elastography in histologically proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients: a Spanish cohort.
    Lara Romero C; Liang JX; Fernández Lizaranzazu I; Ampuero Herrojo J; Castell J; Del Prado Alba C; Domínguez Pascual I; Romero Gómez M
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 Apr; 115(4):162-167. PubMed ID: 35791792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An individual patient data meta-analysis to determine cut-offs for and confounders of NAFLD-fibrosis staging with magnetic resonance elastography.
    Liang JX; Ampuero J; Niu H; Imajo K; Noureddin M; Behari J; Lee DH; Ehman RL; Rorsman F; Vessby J; Lacalle JR; Mózes FE; Pavlides M; Anstee QM; Harrison SA; Castell J; Loomba R; Romero-Gómez M;
    J Hepatol; 2023 Sep; 79(3):592-604. PubMed ID: 37121437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.
    Lefebvre T; Wartelle-Bladou C; Wong P; Sebastiani G; Giard JM; Castel H; Murphy-Lavallée J; Olivié D; Ilinca A; Sylvestre MP; Gilbert G; Gao ZH; Nguyen BN; Cloutier G; Tang A
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6477-6488. PubMed ID: 31278577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Selvaraj EA; Mózes FE; Jayaswal ANA; Zafarmand MH; Vali Y; Lee JA; Levick CK; Young LAJ; Palaniyappan N; Liu CH; Aithal GP; Romero-Gómez M; Brosnan MJ; Tuthill TA; Anstee QM; Neubauer S; Harrison SA; Bossuyt PM; Pavlides M;
    J Hepatol; 2021 Oct; 75(4):770-785. PubMed ID: 33991635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography vs. eight clinical prediction rules for non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study.
    Cui J; Ang B; Haufe W; Hernandez C; Verna EC; Sirlin CB; Loomba R
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2015 Jun; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 25873207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Utility of an Increase in Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Predicting Fibrosis Progression in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Ajmera VH; Liu A; Singh S; Yachoa G; Ramey M; Bhargava M; Zamani A; Lopez S; Mangla N; Bettencourt R; Rizo E; Valasek M; Behling C; Richards L; Sirlin C; Loomba R
    Hepatology; 2020 Mar; 71(3):849-860. PubMed ID: 31556124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRE combined with FIB-4 (MEFIB) index in detection of candidates for pharmacological treatment of NASH-related fibrosis.
    Jung J; Loomba RR; Imajo K; Madamba E; Gandhi S; Bettencourt R; Singh S; Hernandez C; Valasek MA; Behling C; Richards L; Fowler K; Sirlin CB; Nakajima A; Loomba R
    Gut; 2021 Oct; 70(10):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 33214165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR elastography is effective for the non-invasive evaluation of fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
    Costa-Silva L; Ferolla SM; Lima AS; Vidigal PVT; Ferrari TCA
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():82-89. PubMed ID: 29279175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a pooled analysis of the diagnostic accuracy.
    Liang Y; Li D
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):89. PubMed ID: 32252641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR elastography-based liver fibrosis correlates with liver events in nonalcoholic fatty liver patients: A multicenter study.
    Han MAT; Vipani A; Noureddin N; Ramirez K; Gornbein J; Saouaf R; Baniesh N; Cummings-John O; Okubote T; Setiawan VW; Rotman Y; Loomba R; Alkhouri N; Noureddin M
    Liver Int; 2020 Sep; 40(9):2242-2251. PubMed ID: 32652744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.
    Singh S; Venkatesh SK; Wang Z; Miller FH; Motosugi U; Low RN; Hassanein T; Asbach P; Godfrey EM; Yin M; Chen J; Keaveny AP; Bridges M; Bohte A; Murad MH; Lomas DJ; Talwalkar JA; Ehman RL
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):440-451.e6. PubMed ID: 25305349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance elastography is superior to acoustic radiation force impulse for the Diagnosis of fibrosis in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A prospective study.
    Cui J; Heba E; Hernandez C; Haufe W; Hooker J; Andre MP; Valasek MA; Aryafar H; Sirlin CB; Loomba R
    Hepatology; 2016 Feb; 63(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 26560734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective Evaluation of Virtual MR Elastography With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Subjects With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Hanniman E; Costa AF; Bowen CV; Abdolell M; Stueck A; McLeod M; Peltekian K; Rioux J; Clarke SE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Nov; 56(5):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 35285996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR elastography in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: inter-center and inter-analysis-method measurement reproducibility and accuracy at 3T.
    Tang A; Dzyubak B; Yin M; Schlein A; Henderson WC; Hooker JC; Delgado TI; Middleton MS; Zheng L; Wolfson T; Gamst A; Loomba R; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):2937-2948. PubMed ID: 34928415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.