These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29908363)
1. Video-Based Assessments of Colonoscopy Inspection Quality Correlate With Quality Metrics and Highlight Areas for Improvement. Duloy A; Yadlapati RH; Benson M; Gawron AJ; Kahi CJ; Kaltenbach TR; McClure J; Gregory DL; Keswani RN Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 17(4):691-700. PubMed ID: 29908363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates. Keswani RN; Wood M; Benson M; Gawron AJ; Kahi C; Kaltenbach T; Yadlapati R; Gregory D; Duloy A Endosc Int Open; 2022 Mar; 10(3):E232-E237. PubMed ID: 35295238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing colon polypectomy competency and its association with established quality metrics. Duloy AM; Kaltenbach TR; Keswani RN Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):635-644. PubMed ID: 28882577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colonoscopy-Naïve Raters Can Be Trained to Assess Colonoscopy Quality. Keswani RN; Benson M; Beveridge C; Gawron AJ; Gluskin AB; Kahi CJ; Kaltenbach TR; McClure J; Schenck R; Yadlapati RH; Duloy A Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Apr; 18(4):989-991.e1. PubMed ID: 31228569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy. Park SK; Kim HY; Lee CK; Cha JM; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE; Park DI Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):886-90. PubMed ID: 27001284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist. Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Withdrawal time of 8 minutes is associated with higher adenoma detection rates in surveillance colonoscopy after surgery for colorectal cancer. Jung DH; Lee JI; Huh CW; Kim MJ; Youn YH; Choi YH; Kim BW Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2354-2361. PubMed ID: 32440929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center. Payne SR; Church TR; Wandell M; Rösch T; Osborn N; Snover D; Day RW; Ransohoff DF; Rex DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24333512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates. Madhoun MF; Tierney WM Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lee CK; Park DI; Lee SH; Hwangbo Y; Eun CS; Han DS; Cha JM; Lee BI; Shin JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Nov; 74(5):1094-102. PubMed ID: 21889137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. Boroff ES; Gurudu SR; Hentz JG; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23567353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy. Melson J; Berger D; Greenspan M; Bayoumi M; Jakate S Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):581-587. PubMed ID: 27597424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]