These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29908477)

  • 1. Recreational use in dispersed public lands measured using social media data and on-site counts.
    Fisher DM; Wood SA; White EM; Blahna DJ; Lange S; Weinberg A; Tomco M; Lia E
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 222():465-474. PubMed ID: 29908477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using social media to estimate visitor provenance and patterns of recreation in Germany's national parks.
    Sinclair M; Mayer M; Woltering M; Ghermandi A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 263():110418. PubMed ID: 32883482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial and Temporal Dynamics and Value of Nature-Based Recreation, Estimated via Social Media.
    Sonter LJ; Watson KB; Wood SA; Ricketts TH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162372. PubMed ID: 27611325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring human-nature interactions in national parks with social media photographs and computer vision.
    Väisänen T; Heikinheimo V; Hiippala T; Toivonen T
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):424-436. PubMed ID: 33749054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterizing, mapping and valuing the demand for forest recreation using crowdsourced social media data.
    Lingua F; Coops NC; Lafond V; Gaston C; Griess VC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272406. PubMed ID: 35951615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Snapshots of Nature-Based Recreation Across Rural Landscapes: Insights from Geotagged Photographs in the Northeastern United States.
    Goldspiel H; Barr B; Badding J; Kuehn D
    Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 71(2):234-248. PubMed ID: 36271154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using crowd-sourced photos to assess seasonal patterns of visitor use in mountain-protected areas.
    Walden-Schreiner C; Rossi SD; Barros A; Pickering C; Leung YF
    Ambio; 2018 Nov; 47(7):781-793. PubMed ID: 29435731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Next-generation visitation models using social media to estimate recreation on public lands.
    Wood SA; Winder SG; Lia EH; White EM; Crowley CSL; Milnor AA
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15419. PubMed ID: 32963262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using cellular device location data to estimate visitation to public lands: Comparing device location data to U.S. National Park Service's visitor use statistics.
    Tsai WL; Merrill NH; Neale AC; Grupper M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0289922. PubMed ID: 37943842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in the impacts of formal and informal recreational trails on urban forest loss and tree structure.
    Ballantyne M; Pickering CM
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 159():94-105. PubMed ID: 26058001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analyzing national parks visitor activities using geotagged social media photos.
    Huang R
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 330():117191. PubMed ID: 36623388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uses and Limitations of Social Media to Inform Visitor Use Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Systematic Review.
    Wilkins EJ; Wood SA; Smith JW
    Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 67(1):120-132. PubMed ID: 33063153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using social media to quantify spatial and temporal dynamics of nature-based recreational activities.
    Mancini F; Coghill GM; Lusseau D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200565. PubMed ID: 30011294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recreational trails reduce the density of ground-dwelling birds in protected areas.
    Thompson B
    Environ Manage; 2015 May; 55(5):1181-90. PubMed ID: 25813628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the influence of activity participation on the economic value of nature-based recreation in the Sierra Nevada.
    Dugstad A; Ceria A; Comeros M; Oleson KLL
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jun; 360():121081. PubMed ID: 38733840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recreational Use of the Countryside: No Evidence that High Nature Value Enhances a Key Ecosystem Service.
    Hornigold K; Lake I; Dolman P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165043. PubMed ID: 27828990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.
    Wright HE
    Science; 1974 Nov; 186(4163):487-95. PubMed ID: 17790369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A crowdsourced valuation of recreational ecosystem services using social media data: An application to a tropical wetland in India.
    Sinclair M; Ghermandi A; Sheela AM
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 642():356-365. PubMed ID: 29906727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficacy of combined educational and site management actions in reducing off-trail hiking in an urban-proximate protected area.
    Hockett KS; Marion JL; Leung YF
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28778002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.