BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29908920)

  • 1. A New Metastatic Lymph Node Classification-based Survival Predicting Model in Patients With Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A Derivation and Validation Study.
    Wu S; Chen JN; Zhang QW; Tang CT; Zhang XT; Tang MY; Li XB; Ge ZZ
    EBioMedicine; 2018 Jun; 32():134-141. PubMed ID: 29908920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative metastatic lymph node burden and survival in Merkel cell carcinoma.
    Nguyen AT; Luu M; Lu DJ; Hamid O; Mallen-St Clair J; Faries MB; Gharavi NM; Ho AS; Zumsteg ZS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Feb; 84(2):312-320. PubMed ID: 31954753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting the outcome in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma: A population-based cohort and international multicentre cohort study.
    Zhou YY; Du XJ; Zhang CH; Aparicio T; Zaanan A; Afchain P; Chen LP; Hu SK; Zhang PC; Wu M; Zhang QW; Wang H
    EBioMedicine; 2019 Mar; 41():276-285. PubMed ID: 30824384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of a novel competing risk model for predicting survival of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a SEER population-based study and external validation.
    Wang T; Wu Y; Zhou H; Wu C; Zhang X; Chen Y; Zhao D
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):38. PubMed ID: 33499821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and total lymph node count for small bowel adenocarcinoma.
    Tran TB; Qadan M; Dua MM; Norton JA; Poultsides GA; Visser BC
    Surgery; 2015 Aug; 158(2):486-93. PubMed ID: 26013988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a novel salivary gland cancer lymph node staging system.
    Aro K; Ho AS; Luu M; Kim S; Tighiouart M; Clair JM; Yoshida EJ; Shiao SL; Leivo I; Zumsteg ZS
    Cancer; 2018 Aug; 124(15):3171-3180. PubMed ID: 29742277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substaging of Lymph Node Status in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Has Strong Prognostic Correlations: Proposal for a Revised N Classification for TNM Staging.
    Basturk O; Saka B; Balci S; Postlewait LM; Knight J; Goodman M; Kooby D; Sarmiento JM; El-Rayes B; Choi H; Bagci P; Krasinskas A; Quigley B; Reid MD; Akkas G; Maithel SK; Adsay V
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S1187-95. PubMed ID: 26362048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic nomograms combining N classification with ratio-based nodal classifications to predict long-term survival for patients with lung adenocarcinoma after surgery: a SEER population-based study.
    Wang S; Yu Y; Xu W; Lv X; Zhang Y; Liu M
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):653. PubMed ID: 34344326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substaging Nodal Status in Ampullary Carcinomas has Significant Prognostic Value: Proposed Revised Staging Based on an Analysis of 313 Well-Characterized Cases.
    Balci S; Basturk O; Saka B; Bagci P; Postlewait LM; Tajiri T; Jang KT; Ohike N; Kim GE; Krasinskas A; Choi H; Sarmiento JM; Kooby DA; El-Rayes BF; Knight JH; Goodman M; Akkas G; Reid MD; Maithel SK; Adsay V
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22(13):4392-401. PubMed ID: 25783680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative-intent resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A matched cohort study.
    Ecker BL; McMillan MT; Datta J; Dempsey DT; Karakousis GC; Fraker DL; Drebin JA; Mamtani R; Giantonio BJ; Roses RE
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Dec; 69():135-141. PubMed ID: 27821316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.
    O'Sullivan B; Huang SH; Su J; Garden AS; Sturgis EM; Dahlstrom K; Lee N; Riaz N; Pei X; Koyfman SA; Adelstein D; Burkey BB; Friborg J; Kristensen CA; Gothelf AB; Hoebers F; Kremer B; Speel EJ; Bowles DW; Raben D; Karam SD; Yu E; Xu W
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Apr; 17(4):440-451. PubMed ID: 26936027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
    Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
    Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of a new staging system based on the retrieved number and metastatic rate of LNs in gastric cancer with ≤15 retrieved LNs.
    Tu RH; Lin JX; Wang W; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Zhou ZW; Zheng CH; Huang CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2221-2228. PubMed ID: 32859432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Single-Institution Validation Study of Lymph Node Staging By the AJCC 8th Edition for Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer: A Proposal to Subdivide the N2 Category.
    Asano D; Nara S; Kishi Y; Esaki M; Hiraoka N; Tanabe M; Shimada K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):2112-2120. PubMed ID: 31037440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metastatic lymph node burden predictive of survival in patients undergoing primary surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.
    Choi Y; Bin-Manie M; Roh JL; Cho KJ; Lee YS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 145(10):2565-2572. PubMed ID: 31352569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
    Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen SB; Weng HR; Wang G; Zou XF; Liu DT; Chen YP; Zhang H
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jun; 21(24):7514-21. PubMed ID: 26139998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personalized four-category staging for predicting prognosis in patients with small bowel Adenocarcinoma: an international development and validation study.
    Dai ZH; Wang QW; Zhang QW; Yan XL; Aparicio T; Zhou YY; Wang H; Zhang CH; Zaanan A; Afchain P; Zhang Y; Chen HM; Gao YJ; Ge ZZ
    EBioMedicine; 2020 Oct; 60():102979. PubMed ID: 32980692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The number of lymph node metastases influences survival and International Union Against Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Zhang HL; Chen LQ; Liu RL; Shi YT; He M; Meng XL; Bai SX; Ping YM
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Jan; 23(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19392846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metastasis Pattern and Survival Analysis in Primary Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A SEER-Based Study.
    Gu Y; Deng H; Wang D; Li Y
    Front Surg; 2021; 8():759162. PubMed ID: 34950695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.