These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29909098)

  • 21. Haemodynamic performance of the small supra-annular Trifecta bioprosthesis: results from a French multicentre study.
    Fouquet O; Flecher E; Nzomvuama A; Remadi JP; Bière L; Donal E; Levy F; Dalmayrac E; Szymanski C; Leguerrier A; Tribouilloy C
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 22(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 27002012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The 3f Enable sutureless bioprosthesis: Early results, safeguards, and pitfalls.
    Permanyer E; Estigarribia AJ; Ysasi A; Herrero E; Semper O; Llorens R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 149(6):1578-83. PubMed ID: 25454912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Absence of prosthesis-patient mismatch with the new generation of Edwards stented aortic bioprosthesis.
    Wyss TR; Bigler M; Stalder M; Englberger L; Aymard T; Kadner A; Carrel TP
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):884-7; discussion 887-8. PubMed ID: 20233807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
    Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Limitations in the Assessment of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
    Amorim PA; Diab M; Walther M; Färber G; Hagendorff A; Bonow RO; Doenst T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68(7):550-556. PubMed ID: 30609446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Valve-in-valve implantation of Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis in patients with failing bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Linke A; Woitek F; Merx MW; Schiefer C; Möbius-Winkler S; Holzhey D; Rastan A; Ender J; Walther T; Kelm M; Mohr FW; Schuler G
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(5):689-97. PubMed ID: 23048050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
    Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Short-term follow up with the 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and echocardiographic results.
    Concistrè G; Miceli A; Marchi F; Farneti P; Chiaramonti F; Solinas M; Glauber AG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Nov; 22(6):817-23. PubMed ID: 24597403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Are Suboptimal for Surgery: Results of the Evolut R U.S. Study.
    Popma JJ; Reardon MJ; Khabbaz K; Harrison JK; Hughes GC; Kodali S; George I; Deeb GM; Chetcuti S; Kipperman R; Brown J; Qiao H; Slater J; Williams MR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28183466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fate of aortic bioprostheses: An 18-year experience.
    Piccardo A; Blossier JD; Le Guyader A; Orsel I; Sekkal S; Cornu E; Laskar M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Mar; 151(3):754-761.e1. PubMed ID: 26651959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. One-year outcomes after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement.
    Young C; Laufer G; Kocher A; Solinas M; Alamanni F; Polvani G; Podesser BK; Aramendi JI; Arribas J; Bouchot O; Livi U; Massetti M; Terp K; Giot C; Glauber M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):575-585. PubMed ID: 29415382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hemodynamics and outcomes of aortic valve replacement with a 17- or 19-mm valve.
    Okamura H; Yamaguchi A; Noguchi K; Naito K; Yuri K; Adachi H
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2010 Oct; 18(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 20947599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The first transapical transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation using the J-valve system into a failed biophysio aortic prosthesis in a patient with high risk of coronary obstruction.
    Ye J; Lee AJ; Blanke P; Webb J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(6):1209-1214. PubMed ID: 29602249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implications of Concomitant Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: Insights From the PARTNER 2 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry.
    Sathananthan J; Murdoch DJ; Lindman BR; Zajarias A; Jaber WA; Cremer P; Wood D; Moss R; Cheung A; Ye J; Hahn RT; Crowley A; Leon MB; Mack MJ; Webb JG
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(12):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 29929637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early stenosis of an aortic porcine bioprosthesis due to thrombosis: Case report and literature review.
    Dohi M; Doi K; Yaku H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 149(6):e83-6. PubMed ID: 25816961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve.
    Simonato M; Webb J; Kornowski R; Vahanian A; Frerker C; Nissen H; Bleiziffer S; Duncan A; Rodés-Cabau J; Attizzani GF; Horlick E; Latib A; Bekeredjian R; Barbanti M; Lefevre T; Cerillo A; Hernández JM; Bruschi G; Spargias K; Iadanza A; Brecker S; Palma JH; Finkelstein A; Abdel-Wahab M; Lemos P; Petronio AS; Champagnac D; Sinning JM; Salizzoni S; Napodano M; Fiorina C; Marzocchi A; Leon M; Dvir D
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27301396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice?
    Bashir M; Harky A; Bleetman D; Adams B; Roberts N; Balmforth D; Yap J; Lall K; Shipolini A; Oo A; Uppal R
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 28935509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Early failures of Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis.
    Campisi S; Camilleri L; Innorta A; Azarnoush K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jul; 148(1):e133-4. PubMed ID: 24755333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hemodynamic performance of Trifecta: single-center experience of 400 patients.
    Modi A; Budra M; Miskolczi S; Velissaris T; Kaarne M; Barlow CW; Livesey SA; Ohri SK; Tsang GM
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Feb; 23(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 24823382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Meco M; Montisci A; Miceli A; Panisi P; Donatelli F; Cirri S; Ferrarini M; Lio A; Glauber M
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Feb; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 29453309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.