These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29909877)

  • 1. Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.
    Soares MO; Sharples L; Morton A; Claxton K; Bojke L
    Value Health; 2018 Jun; 21(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 29909877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study.
    Bojke L; Soares M; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples L; Taylor A
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(37):1-124. PubMed ID: 34105510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference Case Methods for Expert Elicitation in Health Care Decision Making.
    Bojke L; Soares MO; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples LD; Taylor A
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 34271832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.
    Cadham CJ; Knoll M; Sánchez-Romero LM; Cummings KM; Douglas CE; Liber A; Mendez D; Meza R; Mistry R; Sertkaya A; Travis N; Levy DT
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):684-703. PubMed ID: 34694168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
    Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
    Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
    Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28870196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.
    Knol AB; Slottje P; van der Sluijs JP; Lebret E
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():19. PubMed ID: 20420657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models.
    Briggs AH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 May; 17(5):479-500. PubMed ID: 10977389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science.
    Martin TG; Burgman MA; Fidler F; Kuhnert PM; Low-Choy S; McBride M; Mengersen K
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22280323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing quality in decision analytic cost-effectiveness models. A suggested framework and example of application.
    Sculpher M; Fenwick E; Claxton K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 May; 17(5):461-77. PubMed ID: 10977388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods to elicit experts' beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration.
    Soares MO; Bojke L; Dumville J; Iglesias C; Cullum N; Claxton K
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(19):2363-80. PubMed ID: 21748773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eliciting uncertainty for complex parameters in model-based economic evaluations: quantifying a temporal change in the treatment effect.
    Jankovic D; Payne K; Kanaan M; Bojke L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Feb; 38(1):e21. PubMed ID: 35177145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elicitation of quantitative data from a heterogeneous expert panel: formal process and application in animal health.
    Van der Fels-Klerx IH; Goossens LH; Saatkamp HW; Horst SH
    Risk Anal; 2002 Feb; 22(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 12017363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.