These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29911359)

  • 1. [Visual outcomes, binocular vision and subjective accommodation after Crystalens HD accommodating intraocular lens implantation].
    Rajska K; Loba P; Wilczynski M; Broniarczyk-Loba A
    Klin Oczna; 2016; 118(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 29911359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
    Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective accommodation measurement of the Crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Zamora-Alejo KV; Moore SP; Parker DG; Ullrich K; Esterman A; Goggin M
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 29(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 23380415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
    Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants.
    Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Davies J; Doane JF; Loden JC; Sivalingham V; Mahmoud AM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 144(3):347-357. PubMed ID: 17651679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of quality of life of patients after phacoemulsification with accommodating lens implantation].
    Ługowska M; Starus M; Synder A; Omulecki W; Wilczyński M
    Klin Oczna; 2014; 116(4):248-56. PubMed ID: 25906635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The influence of sensory deprivation on binocular vision after bilateral cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation].
    Rajska K; Loba P; Broniarczyk-Loba A
    Klin Oczna; 2012; 114(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 23461151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual performances with monofocal, accommodating, and multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract.
    Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Yaylali SA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 20691422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long-term results.
    Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Aydin N; Candemir B; Akçakaya AA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 38(8):768-77. PubMed ID: 20572819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nijkamp MD; Dolders MG; de Brabander J; van den Borne B; Hendrikse F; Nuijts RM
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15465543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Javaloy J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):978-85. PubMed ID: 22624896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.
    Sadoughi MM; Einollahi B; Roshandel D; Sarimohammadli M; Feizi S
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2015; 10(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 27051480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
    Claoué C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
    Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional vision with bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses 6 months after cataract surgery.
    Chiam PJ; Chan JH; Haider SI; Karia N; Kasaby H; Aggarwal RK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2057-61. PubMed ID: 18053904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crystalens HD intraocular lens analysis using an adaptive optics visual simulator.
    Pérez-Vives C; Montés-Micó R; López-Gil N; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Dec; 90(12):1413-23. PubMed ID: 24037058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Ortega P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1568-75. PubMed ID: 22906443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binocular visual function with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens in patients with unilateral cataract.
    Hayashi K; Manabe S; Yoshimura K; Hirata A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 23688871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Secondary diffractive bifocal piggyback intraocular lens implantation.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L; Baamonde MB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1938-43. PubMed ID: 17081900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens].
    Wang J; Fu J; Wang NL; Kang HJ; Yang WL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 41(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 16191347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.