These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29911405)
1. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries. Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vote Choice, Ideology, and Social Dominance Orientation Influence Preferences for Lower Pitched Voices in Political Candidates. Laustsen L; Petersen MB; Klofstad CA Evol Psychol; 2015 Sep; 13(3):1474704915600576. PubMed ID: 37924186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics. Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices. Klofstad CA; Anderson RC; Nowicki S PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133779. PubMed ID: 26252894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When the Party Decides: The Effects of Facial Competence and Dominance on Internal Nominations of Political Candidates. Laustsen L; Petersen MB Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704917732005. PubMed ID: 29911407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preference for leaders with masculine voices holds in the case of feminine leadership roles. Anderson RC; Klofstad CA PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51216. PubMed ID: 23251457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections. Granberg D; Burlison J Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do heads of government age more quickly? Observational study comparing mortality between elected leaders and runners-up in national elections of 17 countries. Olenski AR; Abola MV; Jena AB BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6424. PubMed ID: 26666894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Role of Face and Voice Cues in Predicting the Outcome of Student Representative Elections. Mileva M; Tompkinson J; Watt D; Burton AM Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Apr; 46(4):617-625. PubMed ID: 31409219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections. Rhodebeck LA J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preference for leaders with high and low facial width-to-height ratios: moderating roles of political ideology and voting context. Banai B; Bačić M; Banai IP Curr Issues Personal Psychol; 2023; 11(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 38013826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of facial morphology of UK and US general election candidates: Does the 'power face' exist? Islam S; Taylor CJ; Hayter JP J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Jul; 70(7):931-936. PubMed ID: 28456534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Pennycook G; Rand DG Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations. Cárdenas-Sánchez D; Sampayo AM; Rodríguez-Prieto M; Feged-Rivadeneira A Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19062. PubMed ID: 36352010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Irrelevant events affect voters' evaluations of government performance. Healy AJ; Malhotra N; Mo CH Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(29):12804-9. PubMed ID: 20615955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas. Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distrusting the Process: Electoral Trust, Operational Ideology, and Nonvoting Political Participation in the 2020 American Electorate. Fitz EB; Saunders KL Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):843-857. PubMed ID: 39109092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior. Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voting for a Male Warrior or Female Peacekeeper? Testing the Evolutionary Contingency Hypothesis in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections. Grabo A; van Vugt M Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918773267. PubMed ID: 29911423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inflation in 2022 did not affect congressional voting, but abortion did. Mutz DC; Mansfield ED Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(21):e2319512121. PubMed ID: 38739783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]