BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29911423)

  • 1. Voting for a Male Warrior or Female Peacekeeper? Testing the Evolutionary Contingency Hypothesis in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections.
    Grabo A; van Vugt M
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918773267. PubMed ID: 29911423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction.
    Cheung OS; Jintcharadze D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16825. PubMed ID: 37803154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Warriors and peacekeepers: testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces.
    Spisak BR; Dekker PH; Krüger M; van Vugt M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30399. PubMed ID: 22276190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do We See Masculine Faces as Competent and Feminine Faces as Warm? Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Facial Perception.
    Wen F; Zuo B; Ma S; Xu Y; Coley JD; Wang Y
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920980642. PubMed ID: 33356507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinctive Facial Cues Predict Leadership Rank and Selection.
    Re DE; Rule N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1311-1322. PubMed ID: 28903679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The general age of leadership: older-looking presidential candidates win elections during war.
    Spisak BR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36945. PubMed ID: 22649504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices.
    Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Watkins CD; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Aug; 8(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 22947812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of Emergent Leaders' Faces and Evolution of Social Cheating: Cross-Cultural Experiments.
    Rostovtseva VV; Mezentseva AA; Butovskaya ML
    Evol Psychol; 2022; 20(1):14747049221081733. PubMed ID: 35238674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferences for Masculinity Across Faces, Bodies, and Personality Traits in Homosexual and Bisexual Chinese Men: Relationship to Sexual Self-Labels and Attitudes Toward Masculinity.
    Zheng L; Zheng Y
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Apr; 45(3):725-33. PubMed ID: 25975213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harsh but Expedient: Dominant Leaders Increase Group Cooperation via Threat of Punishment.
    Chen FX; Zhang X; Laustsen L; Cheng JT
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Dec; 32(12):2005-2022. PubMed ID: 34788185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femme/Butch/Androgyne Identity and Preferences for Femininity Across Face, Voice, and Personality Traits in Chinese Lesbian and Bisexual Women.
    Zhang J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2022 Oct; 51(7):3485-3495. PubMed ID: 36028632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revealing Hidden Gender Biases in Competence Impressions of Faces.
    Oh D; Buck EA; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 30526301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts.
    Re DE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 23372088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The eye wants what the heart wants: Female face preferences are related to partner personality preferences.
    Oh D; Grant-Villegas N; Todorov A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1328-1343. PubMed ID: 32757588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caring or daring? Exploring the impact of facial masculinity/femininity and gender category information on first impressions.
    Walker M; Wänke M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0181306. PubMed ID: 29023451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Looking like a leader-facial shape predicts perceived height and leadership ability.
    Re DE; Hunter DW; Coetzee V; Tiddeman BP; Xiao D; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e80957. PubMed ID: 24324651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of Facial Paralysis With Perceptions of Personality and Physical Traits.
    Parsa KM; Hancock M; Nguy PL; Donalek HM; Wang H; Barth J; Reilly MJ
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jun; 3(6):e205495. PubMed ID: 32579192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Adult Sex Ratio Predict Regional Variation in Facial Dominance Perceptions? Evidence From an Analysis of U.S. States.
    Torrance JS; Kandrik M; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918776748. PubMed ID: 29860865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women's Femininity Preferences in Male Faces: Tests Based on Within- and Between-Sex Sexual Dimorphism Facial Manipulations.
    Wen F; Zuo B; Wang Y; Ma S; Song S; Zhang H
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):531-541. PubMed ID: 33398708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.