These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29911423)

  • 21. Oxytocin administration leads to a preference for masculinized male faces.
    Theodoridou A; Rowe AC; Rogers PJ; Penton-Voak IS
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2011 Sep; 36(8):1257-60. PubMed ID: 21377804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation in Women's Preferences Regarding Male Facial Masculinity Is Better Explained by Genetic Differences Than by Previously Identified Context-Dependent Effects.
    Zietsch BP; Lee AJ; Sherlock JM; Jern P
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1440-8. PubMed ID: 26253549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The gender typicality of faces and its impact on visual processing and on hiring decisions.
    von Stockhausen L; Koeser S; Sczesny S
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 23895924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: A replication study.
    Shiramizu V; Docherty C; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242262. PubMed ID: 33186368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.
    Geniole SN; Keyes AE; Mondloch CJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30366. PubMed ID: 22276184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness.
    Vergauwe J; Wille B; Hofmans J; Kaiser RB; De Fruyt F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 114(1):110-130. PubMed ID: 28557471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of leaders' and evaluators' sex on sex-role stereotyping of charismatic leaders.
    Grinnell JP
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 2):1247-52. PubMed ID: 12585545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Dyadic Effects of Top/Bottom Sexual Self-Labels and Partner Sexual Role Requirements on Facial Masculinity Preferences Among Gay and Bisexual Men in China.
    Zheng L
    J Sex Res; 2021 Jan; 58(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 31663784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Demographic and Geographic Differences in Facial Masculinity Preferences Among Gay and Bisexual Men in China.
    Zheng L; Zhang J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Nov; 50(8):3711-3723. PubMed ID: 34697693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Personality Perception in Men Before and After Facial Cosmetic Surgery.
    Parsa KM; Gao W; Lally J; Davison SP; Reilly MJ
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Sep; 21(5):369-374. PubMed ID: 31294743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.
    Sutherland CA; Young AW; Mootz CA; Oldmeadow JA
    Br J Psychol; 2015 May; 106(2):186-208. PubMed ID: 25168952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios.
    Little AC; Roberts SC; Jones BC; Debruine LM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2018-32. PubMed ID: 22650610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Role of Face and Voice Cues in Predicting the Outcome of Student Representative Elections.
    Mileva M; Tompkinson J; Watt D; Burton AM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Apr; 46(4):617-625. PubMed ID: 31409219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceived femininity and masculinity contribute independently to facial impressions.
    Hester N; Jones BC; Hehman E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1147-1164. PubMed ID: 33119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dominant leaders and the political psychology of followership.
    Petersen MB; Laustsen L
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2020 Jun; 33():136-141. PubMed ID: 31430715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Individual differences in perceptions of gay men's sexual role preferences from facial cues.
    Tskhay KO; Re DE; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Nov; 43(8):1615-20. PubMed ID: 24906820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pregnant Women's Preferences for Men's Faces Differ Significantly from Nonpregnant Women.
    Limoncin E; Ciocca G; Gravina GL; Carosa E; Mollaioli D; Cellerino A; Mennucci A; Di Sante S; Lenzi A; Jannini EA
    J Sex Med; 2015 May; 12(5):1142-51. PubMed ID: 25754377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolution of personality differences in leadership.
    Johnstone RA; Manica A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(20):8373-8. PubMed ID: 21536882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.