206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29911503)
1. Examining the impact of audience response systems on student performance in anatomy education: a randomised controlled trial.
Fergusson SJ; Aka JJ; Hennessy CM; Wilson AJ; Parson SH; Harrison EM; Finn GM; Gillingwater TH
Scott Med J; 2018 Feb; 63(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29911503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of PBL methodology in a hybrid dentistry program to enhance students' knowledge and confidence. (a pilot study).
Al-Madi EM; Celur SL; Nasim M
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):270. PubMed ID: 30458764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancement of anatomical learning and developing clinical competence of first-year medical and allied health profession students.
Keim Janssen SA; VanderMeulen SP; Shostrom VK; Lomneth CS
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 24002924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial.
Peine A; Kabino K; Spreckelsen C
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 16():158. PubMed ID: 27256081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of simulation of sectional human anatomy using ultrasound on students' learning outcomes and satisfaction in echocardiography education: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Ding K; Chen M; Li P; Xie Z; Zhang H; Kou R; Xu J; Zou T; Luo Z; Song H
BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):494. PubMed ID: 38702655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bridging the transfer gap: laboratory exercise combines clinical exposure and anatomy review.
Wilson AB; Ross C; Petty M; Williams JM; Thorp LE
Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):790-8. PubMed ID: 19659493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound simulator-assisted teaching of cardiac anatomy to preclinical anatomy students: A pilot randomized trial of a three-hour learning exposure.
Canty DJ; Hayes JA; Story DA; Royse CF
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 24706544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional Visualization Software Assists Learning in Students with Diverse Spatial Intelligence in Medical Education.
Jamil Z; Saeed AA; Madhani S; Baig S; Cheema Z; Fatima SS
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Sep; 12(5):550-560. PubMed ID: 30376698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lecture recording system in anatomy: possible benefit to auditory learners.
Bacro TR; Gebregziabher M; Ariail J
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(6):376-84. PubMed ID: 23508921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Equivalence study of a dental anatomy computer-assisted learning program.
Bogacki RE; Best A; Abbey LM
J Dent Educ; 2004 Aug; 68(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 15286110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An eight-year study of online lecture use in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course.
Nieder GL; Borges NJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(6):311-20. PubMed ID: 22674561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Test-enhanced learning of clinical reasoning: a crossover randomised trial.
Raupach T; Andresen JC; Meyer K; Strobel L; Koziolek M; Jung W; Brown J; Anders S
Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 50(7):711-20. PubMed ID: 27295475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
