These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29911886)

  • 1. Molecular Auditing: An Evaluation of Unsuspected Tissue Specimen Misidentification.
    Demetrick DJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Nov; 142(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 29911886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient misidentification in laboratory medicine: a qualitative analysis of 227 root cause analysis reports in the Veterans Health Administration.
    Dunn EJ; Moga PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Feb; 134(2):244-55. PubMed ID: 20121614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Specimen misidentification in pathology laboratory: trends and measures].
    Minato H; Fukushima M; Nojima T; Nakano M
    Rinsho Byori; 2013 Aug; 61(8):751-9. PubMed ID: 24218776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular confirmation of pathological specimen integrity in Australasia.
    Bell CG; Wood DR; Cheong SJ; Kwan E; Sinosich M; Delprado W; Baumgart KW
    Pathology; 2009; 41(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 19291541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization.
    Zarbo RJ; Tuthill JM; D'Angelo R; Varney R; Mahar B; Neuman C; Ormsby A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 131(4):468-77. PubMed ID: 19289582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
    Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rate of occult specimen provenance complications in routine clinical practice.
    Pfeifer JD; Liu J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 139(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 23270904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.
    Layfield LJ; Anderson GM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 134(3):466-70. PubMed ID: 20716804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
    Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence of missing pathology specimens in dermatology.
    Johnson AG; Behrens KG; Delozier SJ; Honda KS
    J Cutan Pathol; 2021 Nov; 48(11):1347-1352. PubMed ID: 34075625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of tissue contamination by polymorphic deletion probe fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Chiang S; Yip S; Betensky RA; Batten JM; Misdraji J; John Iafrate A
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Oct; 36(10):1464-71. PubMed ID: 22982889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of mislabeled specimen by molecular methods: case report and review.
    Mariappan MR; Zehnder J; Arber DA; Lay M; Fadare O; Schrijver I
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2005 Jul; 13(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 16086080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biopsy misidentification identified by DNA profiling in a large multicenter trial.
    Marberger M; McConnell JD; Fowler I; Andriole GL; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Rittmaster RS
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(13):1744-9. PubMed ID: 21444877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology.
    Fabbretti G
    Pathologica; 2011 Dec; 103(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 22558887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization.
    Dimenstein IB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Dec; 132(6):975-6; author reply 976-7. PubMed ID: 19926589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing and pilot testing practical measures of preanalytic surgical specimen identification defects.
    Bixenstine PJ; Zarbo RJ; Holzmueller CG; Yenokyan G; Robinson R; Hudson DW; Prescott AM; Hubble R; Murphy MM; George CT; D'Angelo R; Watson SR; Lubomski LH; Berenholtz SM
    Am J Med Qual; 2013; 28(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 23322909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Bekeris LG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 21809987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of turnaround times as a component of quality assurance in surgical pathology.
    Ribé A; Ribalta T; Lledó R; Torras G; Asenjo MA; Cardesa A
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1998 Jun; 10(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 9661063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.