These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29912015)
41. Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach. McShane BB; Böckenholt U Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 26651984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Introduction of a User-oriented Application for Biometrical Sample Size Calculation in Clinical and Epidemiological Trials]. Geis B; Tulka S; Knippschild S; Krummenauer F Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2021 Feb; 238(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 31117147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values. Corty EW; Corty RW Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Sample size determination in medical and surgical research. Flikkema RM; Toledo-Pereyra LH J Invest Surg; 2012 Feb; 25(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 22272631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Sample size considerations for superiority trials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Moore AD; Joseph L Lupus; 1999; 8(8):612-9. PubMed ID: 10568897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Concepts in sample size determination. Rao UK Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 23422614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Power and sample size. Case LD; Ambrosius WT Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():377-408. PubMed ID: 18450060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Estimation of sample size and testing power (Part 1). Hu LP; Bao XL; Zhou SG; Guan X; Xin HL Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2011 Oct; 9(10):1070-4. PubMed ID: 22015187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Understanding sample size determination in nursing research. Hayat MJ West J Nurs Res; 2013 Aug; 35(7):943-56. PubMed ID: 23552393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [On the impact of sample size calculation and power in clinical research]. Held U Praxis (Bern 1994); 2014 Oct; 103(20):1197-201. PubMed ID: 25270749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data. Bonett DG; Price RM Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):3039-47. PubMed ID: 16345058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Interval estimation of proportion ratios for stratified bilateral correlated binary data. Xue Y; Ma CX Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1987-2014. PubMed ID: 31621503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Negative results and the limitations of power. Penington A ANZ J Surg; 2008; 78(1-2):99-102. PubMed ID: 18199219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A generalized concept of power helped to choose optimal endpoints in clinical trials. Borm GF; van der Wilt GJ; Kremer JA; Zielhuis GA J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 60(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 17346612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy in parameter estimation for ANCOVA and ANOVA contrasts: sample size planning via narrow confidence intervals. Lai K; Kelley K Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 May; 65(2):350-70. PubMed ID: 22004142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A sample size planning approach that considers both statistical significance and clinical significance. Jia B; Lynn HS Trials; 2015 May; 16():213. PubMed ID: 25962998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Selection of the effect size for sample size determination for a continuous response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure. Ciarleglio MM; Arendt CD; Peduzzi PN Clin Trials; 2016 Jun; 13(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 26928986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals. Guyatt G; Jaeschke R; Heddle N; Cook D; Shannon H; Walter S CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 7820798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]