These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 299122)

  • 1. Determination of signal/noise threshold as part of individual hearing aid fitting.
    Skamris NP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):61-3. PubMed ID: 299122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
    Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of hearing improvement due to hearing aids].
    Welzl-Müller K; Sattler K
    HNO; 1985 Jun; 33(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 4030411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Auditory localization and speech perception in noise. Preliminary study concerning 5 cases of perceptual deafness].
    Canévet G; Santon F; Scharf B
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3706968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
    Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of varying the slope of the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Anema PC; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 3558964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "How I do it"--otology and neurology. A specific issue and its solution. Silent masking.
    Brown LA
    Laryngoscope; 1978 Dec; 88(12):2035. PubMed ID: 732501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of procedures and materials for speech reception thresholds.
    Robinson DO; Koenigs MJ
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 4(6):227-30. PubMed ID: 511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the guess factor on the speech reception threshold.
    Burke LE; Nerbonne MA
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 299592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical study of speech understanding in noise].
    Tremblay C; Picard M; Barbarosie T; Banville R
    Audiology; 1991; 30(4):212-40. PubMed ID: 1755750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central masking effects on spondee threshold as a function of masker sensation level and masker sound pressure level.
    Martin FN; Digiovanni D
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 422425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination.
    Lindström B; Svärd I; Bredberg G; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should you be screened for a hearing problem? When to get tested so you don't miss out on the sounds around you.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2013 Jan; 20(5):3. PubMed ID: 23757787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.