118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29912290)
1. Accounting for differential variability in detecting differentially methylated regions.
Wang Y; Teschendorff AE; Widschwendter M; Wang S
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jan; 20(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 29912290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of Epigenetic Field Defects Using a Weighted Epigenetic Distance-Based Method.
Wang Y; Qian M; Ruan P; Teschendorff AE; Wang S
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2117():109-131. PubMed ID: 31960375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of epigenetic modulators in human breast cancer by integrated analysis of DNA methylation and RNA-Seq data.
Zhou X; Chen Z; Cai X
Epigenetics; 2018; 13(5):473-489. PubMed ID: 29940789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lowly methylated region analysis identifies EBF1 as a potential epigenetic modifier in breast cancer.
Fernandez-Jimenez N; Sklias A; Ecsedi S; Cahais V; Degli-Esposti D; Jay A; Ancey PB; Woo HD; Hernandez-Vargas H; Herceg Z
Epigenetics; 2017; 12(11):964-972. PubMed ID: 29099283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring DNA methylation changes in promoter, intragenic, and intergenic regions as early and late events in breast cancer formation.
Rauscher GH; Kresovich JK; Poulin M; Yan L; Macias V; Mahmoud AM; Al-Alem U; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Wiley EL; Tonetti D; Ehrlich M
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():816. PubMed ID: 26510686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The DNA methylation profile of liver tumors in C3H mice and identification of differentially methylated regions involved in the regulation of tumorigenic genes.
Matsushita J; Okamura K; Nakabayashi K; Suzuki T; Horibe Y; Kawai T; Sakurai T; Yamashita S; Higami Y; Ichihara G; Hata K; Nohara K
BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):317. PubMed ID: 29566670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA methylation of neural EGFL like 1 (NELL1) is associated with advanced disease and the metastatic state of renal cell cancer patients.
Peters I; Dubrowinskaja N; Hennenlotter J; Antonopoulos WI; Von Klot CAJ; Tezval H; Stenzl A; Kuczyk MA; Serth J
Oncol Rep; 2018 Dec; 40(6):3861-3868. PubMed ID: 30272321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of epigenetic field defects using a weighted epigenetic distance-based method.
Wang Y; Qian M; Ruan P; Teschendorff AE; Wang S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(1):e6. PubMed ID: 30304472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying CpG sites with different differential methylation frequencies in colorectal cancer tissues based on individualized differential methylation analysis.
Yan H; He J; Guan Q; Cai H; Zhang L; Zheng W; Qi L; Zhang S; Liu H; Li H; Zhao W; Yang S; Guo Z
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(29):47356-47364. PubMed ID: 28537885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrative analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression profiles identified potential breast cancer-specific diagnostic markers.
Liu X; Peng Y; Wang J
Biosci Rep; 2020 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 32412047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of functionally methylated regions based on discriminant analysis through integrating methylation and gene expression data.
Zhang Y; Zhang J
Mol Biosyst; 2015 Jul; 11(7):1786-93. PubMed ID: 25865601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentially methylated regions in T cells identify kidney transplant patients at risk for de novo skin cancer.
Peters FS; Peeters AMA; Mandaviya PR; van Meurs JBJ; Hofland LJ; van de Wetering J; Betjes MGH; Baan CC; Boer K
Clin Epigenetics; 2018; 10():81. PubMed ID: 29946375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying prognostic biomarkers based on aberrant DNA methylation in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.
Chen G; Wang Y; Wang L; Xu W
Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(3):5268-5280. PubMed ID: 28029655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aging related methylation influences the gene expression of key control genes in colorectal cancer and adenoma.
Galamb O; Kalmár A; Barták BK; Patai ÁV; Leiszter K; Péterfia B; Wichmann B; Valcz G; Veres G; Tulassay Z; Molnár B
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 22(47):10325-10340. PubMed ID: 28058013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An effective seven-CpG-based signature to predict survival in renal clear cell carcinoma by integrating DNA methylation and gene expression.
Xu L; He J; Cai Q; Li M; Pu X; Guo Y
Life Sci; 2020 Feb; 243():117289. PubMed ID: 31926254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targeted bisulfite sequencing identified a panel of DNA methylation-based biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Pu W; Wang C; Chen S; Zhao D; Zhou Y; Ma Y; Wang Y; Li C; Huang Z; Jin L; Guo S; Wang J; Wang M
Clin Epigenetics; 2017; 9():129. PubMed ID: 29270239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data.
Mallik S; Seth S; Bhadra T; Zhao Z
Genes (Basel); 2020 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 32806782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SFRP1 CpG island methylation locus is associated with renal cell cancer susceptibility and disease recurrence.
Atschekzei F; Hennenlotter J; Jänisch S; Großhennig A; Tränkenschuh W; Waalkes S; Peters I; Dörk T; Merseburger AS; Stenzl A; Kuczyk MA; Serth J
Epigenetics; 2012 May; 7(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 22419128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NEpiC: a network-assisted algorithm for epigenetic studies using mean and variance combined signals.
Ruan P; Shen J; Santella RM; Zhou S; Wang S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Sep; 44(16):e134. PubMed ID: 27302130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein capture for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveal CpG sequence coverage bias.
Nair SS; Coolen MW; Stirzaker C; Song JZ; Statham AL; Strbenac D; Robinson MD; Clark SJ
Epigenetics; 2011 Jan; 6(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 20818161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
