These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29912908)
1. A novel gel liner system with embedded electrodes for use with upper limb myoelectric prostheses. Reissman T; Halsne E; Lipschutz R; Miller L; Kuiken T PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198934. PubMed ID: 29912908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Outperforms Direct Control for Transhumeral Amputees with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hargrove LJ; Miller LA; Turner K; Kuiken TA Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13840. PubMed ID: 29062019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ; J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fabrication and application of an adjustable myoelectric transhumeral prosthetic socket. Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Stobbe M; Marasco PD; Hebert JS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):564-567. PubMed ID: 30922181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fabric Vest Socket with Embroidered Electrodes for Control of Myoelectric Prosthesis. Lee S; Jamil B; Kim S; Choi Y Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32098252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses. Kerver N; Karssies E; Krabbe PFM; van der Sluis CK; Groen H Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 45(25):4311-4321. PubMed ID: 36533430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards assessing the preferred usage features of upper limb prostheses: most important items regarding prosthesis use in people with major unilateral upper limb absence-a Dutch national survey. Kerver N; van der Sluis CK; van Twillert S; Krabbe PFM Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7554-7565. PubMed ID: 34813394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment. Schweitzer W; Thali MJ; Egger D J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel myoelectric training device for upper limb prostheses. Clingman R; Pidcoe P IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jul; 22(4):879-85. PubMed ID: 24710835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss. Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks. Thies SB; Kenney LP; Sobuh M; Galpin A; Kyberd P; Stine R; Major MJ Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():137-143. PubMed ID: 28684214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Control within a virtual environment is correlated to functional outcomes when using a physical prosthesis. Hargrove L; Miller L; Turner K; Kuiken T J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):60. PubMed ID: 30255800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control. Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of electromyography recorded using textile electrodes in classifying arm movements. Li G; Geng Y; Tao D; Zhou P Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():4243-6. PubMed ID: 22255276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. Parker P; Englehart K; Hudgins B J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Dec; 16(6):541-8. PubMed ID: 17045489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study. Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic tuning of myoelectric prostheses. Bonivento C; Davalli A; Fantuzzi C; Sacchetti R; Terenzi S J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jul; 35(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 9704313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review on the advancements in the field of upper limb prosthesis. Das N; Nagpal N; Bankura SS J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Oct; 42(7):532-545. PubMed ID: 30875266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]