580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29913354)
1. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
Turcot K; Sagawa Y; Lacraz A; Lenoir J; Assal M; Armand S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.
Houdijk H; Wezenberg D; Hak L; Cutti AG
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):76. PubMed ID: 30255807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
Struchkov V; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
Zmitrewicz RJ; Neptune RR; Walden JG; Rogers WE; Bosker GW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation.
Underwood HA; Tokuno CD; Eng JJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jul; 19(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 15234485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-distance walking effects on trans-tibial amputees compensatory gait patterns and implications on prosthetic designs and training.
Yeung LF; Leung AK; Zhang M; Lee WC
Gait Posture; 2012 Feb; 35(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 22055554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthetic push-off power in trans-tibial amputee level ground walking: A systematic review.
Müller R; Tronicke L; Abel R; Lechler K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225032. PubMed ID: 31743353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthetic feet: state-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics.
Versluys R; Beyl P; Van Damme M; Desomer A; Van Ham R; Lefeber D
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Mar; 4(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 19253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinetic differences between level walking and ramp descent in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation using a prosthetic knee without a stance control mechanism.
Okita Y; Yamasaki N; Nakamura T; Kubo T; Mitsumoto A; Akune T
Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():80-85. PubMed ID: 29723652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of prosthetic ankle stiffness on ankle and knee kinematics, prosthetic limb loading, and net metabolic cost of trans-tibial amputee gait.
Major MJ; Twiste M; Kenney LP; Howard D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 24238976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of walking speed on minimum toe clearance and on the temporal relationship between minimum clearance and peak swing-foot velocity in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.
De Asha AR; Buckley JG
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 24469428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost.
Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users.
Hansen AH; Meier MR; Sessoms PH; Childress DS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 17162519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions and biomechanical effects of varying prosthetic ankle stiffness during uphill walking: A case series.
Ármannsdóttir AL; Lecomte C; Lemaire E; Brynjólfsson S; Briem K
Gait Posture; 2024 Feb; 108():354-360. PubMed ID: 38227995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.
Lamers EP; Eveld ME; Zelik KE
J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109273. PubMed ID: 31431348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact on the biomechanics of overground gait of using an 'Echelon' hydraulic ankle-foot device in unilateral trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees.
De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Aug; 29(7):728-34. PubMed ID: 24997811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking.
Grabowski AM; D'Andrea S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 10():49. PubMed ID: 23758860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
