272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29915992)
1. False Positive Reduction by an Annular Model as a Set of Few Features for Microcalcification Detection to Assist Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
Hernández-Capistrán J; Martínez-Carballido JF; Rosas-Romero R
J Med Syst; 2018 Jun; 42(8):134. PubMed ID: 29915992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):159. PubMed ID: 26745908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast microcalcifications detection based on fusing features with DTCWT.
Wang Z; Xin J; Zhang Q; Gao S; Ma C; Ren J; Zhang H; Qian W; Zhu W; Zhang X; Liu J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 31985483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grouped fuzzy SVM with EM-based partition of sample space for clustered microcalcification detection.
Wang H; Feng J; Wang H
Technol Health Care; 2017 Jul; 25(S1):325-336. PubMed ID: 28582921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications.
Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN; Edwards A
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1278-85. PubMed ID: 16229415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fissures segmentation using surface features: content-based retrieval for mammographic mass using ensemble classifier.
Liu H; Lan Y; Xu X; Song E; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1475-84. PubMed ID: 22055794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: Study on applying adaboost with SVM-based component classifiers.
Dehghan F; Abrishami-Moghaddam H; Giti M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4789-92. PubMed ID: 19163787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic detection of microcalcifications using mathematical morphology and a support vector machine.
Zhang E; Wang F; Li Y; Bai X
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24211882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Detection of microcalcification clusters regions in mammograms combining discriminative deep belief networks].
Song L; Wei X; Wang Q; Wang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 38(2):268-275. PubMed ID: 33913286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Efficient Approach for Automated Mass Segmentation and Classification in Mammograms.
Dong M; Lu X; Ma Y; Guo Y; Ma Y; Wang K
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):613-25. PubMed ID: 25776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Based on Texture Analysis Using Support Vector Machine Classifier with Clinical Evaluation.
Kamra A; Jain VK; Singh S; Mittal S
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 26138756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microcalcification detection in full-field digital mammograms: A fully automated computer-aided system.
Basile TMA; Fanizzi A; Losurdo L; Bellotti R; Bottigli U; Dentamaro R; Didonna V; Fausto A; Massafra R; Moschetta M; Tamborra P; Tangaro S; La Forgia D
Phys Med; 2019 Aug; 64():1-9. PubMed ID: 31515007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A wavelet-based algorithm for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1294-305. PubMed ID: 10435531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Digital Mammography Images Using Automatic Detection for the Region of Interest.
Ramadan SZ; El-Banna M
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(7):902-912. PubMed ID: 33059560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
