These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29916042)

  • 21. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task.
    Luo CR; Johnson RA; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):833-43. PubMed ID: 9701974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words.
    Xu J; Taft M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):904-10. PubMed ID: 25151246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity.
    Gennari S; Poeppel D
    Cognition; 2003 Aug; 89(1):B27-41. PubMed ID: 12893127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lexical factors and cerebral regions influencing verbal fluency performance in MCI.
    Clark DG; Wadley VG; Kapur P; DeRamus TP; Singletary B; Nicholas AP; Blanton PD; Lokken K; Deshpande H; Marson D; Deutsch G
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Feb; 54():98-111. PubMed ID: 24384308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of relatedness proportion on the joint relationship among word frequency, stimulus quality, and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
    Aschenbrenner AJ; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2452-2461. PubMed ID: 30947626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psycholinguistic norms for more than 300 lexical signs in German Sign Language (DGS).
    Trettenbrein PC; Pendzich NK; Cramer JM; Steinbach M; Zaccarella E
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):1817-1832. PubMed ID: 33575986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semantic transparency effects in German compounds: A large dataset and multiple-task investigation.
    Günther F; Marelli M; Bölte J
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1208-1224. PubMed ID: 32052353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imageability and semantic association in the representation and processing of event verbs.
    Xu X; Kang C; Guo T
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 26747462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of input frequency and semantic transparency in the acquisition of verb meaning: evidence from placement verbs in Tamil and Dutch.
    Narasimhan B; Gullberg M
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):504-32. PubMed ID: 20609281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs.
    Saji N; Hong C; Wang C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0296628. PubMed ID: 38241255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lexico-semantic effects on word naming in Persian: does age of acquisition have an effect?
    Bakhtiar M; Weekes B
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):298-313. PubMed ID: 25324046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax.
    Theakston AL; Lieven EV; Pine JM; Rowland CF
    J Child Lang; 2004 Feb; 31(1):61-99. PubMed ID: 15053085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can word formation be understood or understanded by semantics alone?
    Gordon P; Miozzo M
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):30-72. PubMed ID: 17498681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrophysiological signatures of event words: Dissociating syntactic and semantic category effects in lexical processing.
    Lapinskaya N; Uzomah U; Bedny M; Lau E
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):151-157. PubMed ID: 27794431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semantic similarity and associated abstractness norms for 630 French word pairs.
    Lakhzoum D; Izaute M; Ferrand L
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Jun; 53(3):1166-1178. PubMed ID: 33006067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Embodied cognition comes of age: A processing advantage for action words is modulated by aging and the task.
    Miklashevsky A; Reifegerste J; García AM; Pulvermüller F; Balota DA; Veríssimo J; Ullman MT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1725-1764. PubMed ID: 38780562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lexical-semantic variables affecting picture and word naming in Chinese: a mixed logit model study in aphasia.
    Crepaldi D; Che WC; Su IF; Luzzatti C
    Behav Neurol; 2012; 25(3):165-84. PubMed ID: 22713389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.