1043 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29916674)
1. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Timing of planned repeat cesarean delivery after two or more previous cesarean sections--risk for unplanned cesarean delivery and pregnancy outcome.
Melamed N; Hadar E; Keidar L; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Mar; 27(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 23795868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes among Thai and other Southeast Asian pregnant women.
Phaloprakarn C; Tangjitgamol S; Manusirivithaya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Aug; 42(8):936-43. PubMed ID: 27079277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks.
Glavind J; Uldbjerg N
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 25689238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries.
Chiossi G; Lai Y; Landon MB; Spong CY; Rouse DJ; Varner MW; Caritis SN; Sorokin Y; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 121(3):561-569. PubMed ID: 23635619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Major risk factors of maternal adverse outcome in women with two or more previous cesarean sections.
Egić A; Karadžov-Orlić N; Mojović D; Milovanović Z; Vučeljić J; Krsmanović S
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(8):751-6. PubMed ID: 29328610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section.
Fisler RE; Cohen A; Ringer SA; Lieberman E
Birth; 2003 Jun; 30(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12752164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.
Spong CY; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Rouse DJ; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Simhan HN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 17906012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
Glavind J; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N; Khalil M; Møller AM; Mortensen BB; Rasmussen OB; Christensen JT; Jørgensen JS; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2013 Aug; 120(9):1123-32. PubMed ID: 23682628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of neonatal outcomes in elective repeat cesarean delivery at term according to weeks of gestation.
Ertuğrul S; Gün I; Müngen E; Muhçu M; Kılıç S; Atay V
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 22889289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean].
He L; Chen M; He GL; Liu XX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):586-91. PubMed ID: 27561937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section].
Qu ZQ; Ma RM; Xiao H; Tian YQ; Li BL; Liang K; Du MY; Chen Z; Geng L; Yang MH; Tao YP; Zhu B
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):748-753. PubMed ID: 27788742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Timing of Repeat Cesarean Delivery for Women with a Prior Classical Incision.
Ma'ayeh M; Haight P; Oliver EA; Landon MB; Rood KM
Am J Perinatol; 2021 May; 38(6):529-534. PubMed ID: 33053596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The safety of a trial of labor after cesarean section in a grandmultiparous population.
Kugler E; Shoham-Vardi I; Burstien E; Mazor M; Hershkovitz R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 17957377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of Emergency Operations, Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes according to the Planned Gestational Age for Cesarean Delivery.
Lee SM; Park JS; Jung YM; Kim SA; Ahn JH; Youm J; Park CW; Jun JK
J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 33(7):e51. PubMed ID: 29359538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does cesarean section before the scheduled date increase the risk of neonatal morbidity?
Riskin A; Gonen R; Kugelman A; Maroun E; Ekhilevitch G
Isr Med Assoc J; 2014 Sep; 16(9):559-63. PubMed ID: 25351013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association between timing of elective cesarean delivery and adverse outcomes among women with at least two previous cesareans.
Hamadneh J; Alchalabi H; Hamadneh S; Amarin Z; Khader YS; Kassab M; Bani-Hani M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Apr; 137(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 28099752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.
Studsgaard A; Skorstengaard M; Glavind J; Hvidman L; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1256-63. PubMed ID: 23962339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
