250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29916721)
1. Imaging peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer with
Honma Y; Terauchi T; Tateishi U; Kano D; Nagashima K; Shoji H; Iwasa S; Takashima A; Kato K; Hamaguchi T; Boku N; Shimada Y; Yamada Y
Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180259. PubMed ID: 29916721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 18F-FLT PET/CT imaging is not competent for the pretreatment evaluation of metastatic gastric cancer: a comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.
Zhou M; Wang C; Hu S; Zhang Y; Yao Z; Li J; Guo W; Zhang Y
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Jul; 34(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 23604223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?
Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the diagnostic value of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the assessment of regional lymph node in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
Han D; Yu J; Zhong X; Fu Z; Mu D; Zhang B; Xu G; Yang W; Zhao S
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):416-26. PubMed ID: 21951837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A pilot study of the diagnostic and prognostic values of FLT-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Jinguji M; Nakajo M; Nihara T; Fukukura Y; Yoshiura T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1210-1221. PubMed ID: 27891549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of interim fluorodeoxyglucose and fluorothymidine PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Wang R; Xu B; Liu C; Guan Z; Zhang J; Li F; Sun L; Zhu H
Br J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 91(1091):20180240. PubMed ID: 30004787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Jinguji M; Nishimata N; Shimaoka S; Nihara T; Aridome K; Tanaka S; Fukukura Y; Tani A; Koriyama C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Aug; 40(8):1223-32. PubMed ID: 23653240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of metastases from postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison between FDG and FLT PET/CT studies.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kajiya Y; Tanabe H; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Koriyama C
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):891-901. PubMed ID: 23468571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FLT-PET/CT diagnosis of primary and metastatic nodal lesions of gastric cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Jinguji M; Nakajo M; Yoshiura T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Oct; 41(10):1891-8. PubMed ID: 27255652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of FLT-PET/CT and CECT in gastric cancer diagnosis.
Staniuk T; Małkowski B; Śrutek E; Szlęzak P; Zegarski W
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1349-56. PubMed ID: 26826089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of CT and 18F-FDG pet for detecting peritoneal metastasis on the preoperative evaluation for gastric carcinoma.
Lim JS; Kim MJ; Yun MJ; Oh YT; Kim JH; Hwang HS; Park MS; Cha SW; Lee JD; Noh SH; Yoo HS; Kim KW
Korean J Radiol; 2006; 7(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 17143028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of
Mori M; Fujioka T; Ichikawa R; Inomata R; Katsuta L; Yashima Y; Yamaga E; Tsuchiya J; Hayashi K; Kumaki Y; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Kubota K; Tateishi U
Tomography; 2022 Oct; 8(5):2533-2546. PubMed ID: 36287810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?
Perlaza P; Ortín J; Pagès M; Buxó E; Fernández-Esparrach G; Colletti PM; Rubello D; Mayoral M; Sánchez N; Ruiz C; Ginés A; Fuster D
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 43(6):402-410. PubMed ID: 29485442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT PET/CT imaging in the characterization of mediastinal lymph nodes.
Rayamajhi SJ; Mittal BR; Maturu VN; Agarwal R; Bal A; Dey P; Shukla J; Gupta D
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 30(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 26661845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and
Noij DP; Martens RM; Zwezerijnen B; Koopman T; de Bree R; Hoekstra OS; de Graaf P; Castelijns JA
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():20-25. PubMed ID: 30292267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Bladder Cancer using Maximum Standardised Uptake Value and
Vind-Kezunovic S; Bouchelouche K; Ipsen P; Høyer S; Bell C; Bjerggaard Jensen J
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28753817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Early Interim FLT PET/CT versus FDG PET/CT with IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST Criteria for Early Therapeutic Monitoring.
Minamimoto R; Fayad L; Advani R; Vose J; Macapinlac H; Meza J; Hankins J; Mottaghy F; Juweid M; Quon A
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 26854705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
