These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29916792)
1. Alpha and Beta Oscillations Index Semantic Congruency between Speech and Gestures in Clear and Degraded Speech. Drijvers L; Özyürek A; Jensen O J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 30(8):1086-1097. PubMed ID: 29916792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing and seeing meaning in noise: Alpha, beta, and gamma oscillations predict gestural enhancement of degraded speech comprehension. Drijvers L; Özyürek A; Jensen O Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 May; 39(5):2075-2087. PubMed ID: 29380945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise. Drijvers L; van der Plas M; Özyürek A; Jensen O Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():55-67. PubMed ID: 30905837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Native language status of the listener modulates the neural integration of speech and iconic gestures in clear and adverse listening conditions. Drijvers L; Özyürek A Brain Lang; 2018; 177-178():7-17. PubMed ID: 29421272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TMS Reveals Dynamic Interaction between Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus in Gesture-Speech Semantic Integration. Zhao W; Li Y; Du Y J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(50):10356-10364. PubMed ID: 34785579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid invisible frequency tagging reveals nonlinear integration of auditory and visual information. Drijvers L; Jensen O; Spaak E Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):1138-1152. PubMed ID: 33206441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-native Listeners Benefit Less from Gestures and Visible Speech than Native Listeners During Degraded Speech Comprehension. Drijvers L; Özyürek A Lang Speech; 2020 Jun; 63(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30795715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions. Holle H; Obleser J; Rueschemeyer SA; Gunter TC Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):875-84. PubMed ID: 19733670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over Left Inferior Frontal and Posterior Temporal Cortex Disrupts Gesture-Speech Integration. Zhao W; Riggs K; Schindler I; Holle H J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(8):1891-1900. PubMed ID: 29358361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial-temporal dynamics of gesture-speech integration: a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study. He Y; Steines M; Sommer J; Gebhardt H; Nagels A; Sammer G; Kircher T; Straube B Brain Struct Funct; 2018 Sep; 223(7):3073-3089. PubMed ID: 29737415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Degree of Language Experience Modulates Visual Attention to Visible Speech and Iconic Gestures During Clear and Degraded Speech Comprehension. Drijvers L; Vaitonytė J; Özyürek A Cogn Sci; 2019 Oct; 43(10):e12789. PubMed ID: 31621126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: insights from brain and behaviour. Özyürek A Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2014 Sep; 369(1651):20130296. PubMed ID: 25092664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: insights from event-related brain potentials. Ozyürek A; Willems RM; Kita S; Hagoort P J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 19(4):605-16. PubMed ID: 17381252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural interaction of speech and gesture: differential activations of metaphoric co-verbal gestures. Kircher T; Straube B; Leube D; Weis S; Sachs O; Willmes K; Konrad K; Green A Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 18771673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The connectivity signature of co-speech gesture integration: The superior temporal sulcus modulates connectivity between areas related to visual gesture and auditory speech processing. Straube B; Wroblewski A; Jansen A; He Y Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():539-549. PubMed ID: 30025854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension. Kelly SD; Kravitz C; Hopkins M Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):253-60. PubMed ID: 15010257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of iconic gestures in speech disambiguation: ERP evidence. Holle H; Gunter TC J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1175-92. PubMed ID: 17583993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Co-speech gestures influence neural activity in brain regions associated with processing semantic information. Dick AS; Goldin-Meadow S; Hasson U; Skipper JI; Small SL Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Nov; 30(11):3509-26. PubMed ID: 19384890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual Context Enhanced: The Joint Contribution of Iconic Gestures and Visible Speech to Degraded Speech Comprehension. Drijvers L; Özyürek A J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27960196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]