These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29916893)

  • 21. Barriers and Attitudes to Research Among Residents in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A National Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
    Canadian Plastic Surgery Research Collaborative (CPSRC)
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 28551364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fellowship selection criteria in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.
    Meyer DR; Dewan MA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 20592634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants.
    Ewing JN; Gala Z; Lemdani MS; Crystal D; Broach RB; Azoury SC
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Sep; 81(9):1320-1330. PubMed ID: 39034224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How Informative are the Plastic Surgery Residency Websites to Prospective Applicants?
    Hashmi A; Policherla R; Campbell H; Khan FA; Schumaier A; Al-Mufarrej F
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 27717704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Poly-Specialty Application Practices of Medical Students Applying to Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency.
    McMackin KK; Trani J; Carpenter JP; Batista PM; Fadoul MA; Hoell NG; Lombardi JV
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Nov; 69():125-132. PubMed ID: 32554201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Geographic Trends in the Plastic Surgery Match.
    Silvestre J; Lin IC; Serletti JM; Chang B
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 26774936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interview experience, post-interview communication, and gender-based differences in the integrated vascular surgery residency match.
    Fereydooni A; Ramirez JL; Morrow KL; Sorondo S; Lee JT; Coleman DM; Chandra V
    J Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 75(1):316-322.e2. PubMed ID: 34197947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Updated View of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Borsting EA; Chim JH; Thaller SR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26418789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating Factors and Resources Affecting Ranking of Diagnostic Radiology Residency Programs by Medical Students in 2016-2017.
    Luk L; Maher MD; Desperito E; Weintraub JL; Amin S; Ayyala RS
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):1344-1352. PubMed ID: 30033195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. General Surgery Applicants are Interested in Global Surgery, but Does It Affect Their Rank List?
    Wilkinson KH; Bowder AN; Goldblatt MI; Olson L; Dodgion CM
    J Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 257():449-454. PubMed ID: 32892144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association of Mentor-to-Program Contact and Applicant Rank Disclosure With Vitreoretinal Fellowship Applicant's Final Match Outcome in 2016 and 2017.
    Christiansen SM; Osher JM; Riemann CD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(6):642-647. PubMed ID: 29710103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Insights from San Francisco match rank lists, part II: are programs doing it wrong?
    Nagarkar PA; Malafa M; Janis JE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 73(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 25222925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recruiting strategies for potential 0+5 vascular residency applicants.
    Illig KA; Kalata E; Reed A; Glass C; Gillespie DL
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Jan; 26(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21764547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is It Safe to Ask the Questions That Matter Most to Me? Observations From a Female Residency Applicant.
    Weaver AN; Willett LL
    Acad Med; 2019 Nov; 94(11):1635-1637. PubMed ID: 31192805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aesthetic Surgery Fellowship Selection Criteria: A National Fellowship Director Survey.
    Egro FM; Saliu OT; Nahai F; Nguyen VT
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Sep; 37(8):961-966. PubMed ID: 28333194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictors of Plastic Surgery Applicant Success: An Analysis of the Texas STAR Database.
    Hallman TG; Qureshi U; Soltani H; Gutowski KS; Arcelona C; Donaldson R; Mihalic AP; Gosain AK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1084-1088. PubMed ID: 38709027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. It was the night before the interview: perceptions of resident applicants about the preinterview reception.
    Schlitzkus LL; Schenarts PJ; Schenarts KD
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 24209651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The independent plastic surgery match: an in-depth analysis of the applicants and process.
    Harper JG; Given KS; Pettitt B; Losken A
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):568-71. PubMed ID: 21372669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Virtual Interviews for the Independent Plastic Surgery Match: A Modern Convenience or a Modern Misrepresentation?
    Bamba R; Bhagat N; Tran PC; Westrick E; Hassanein AH; Wooden WA
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):612-621. PubMed ID: 32958417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.