These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29917051)
1. Combining a Food Frequency Questionnaire With 24-Hour Recalls to Increase the Precision of Estimation of Usual Dietary Intakes-Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project. Freedman LS; Midthune D; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF; Willett W; Neuhouser ML; Tinker LF; Kipnis V Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 187(10):2227-2232. PubMed ID: 29917051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the 24-Hour Recall as a Reference Instrument for Calibrating Other Self-Report Instruments in Nutritional Cohort Studies: Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project. Freedman LS; Commins JM; Willett W; Tinker LF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Baer DJ; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 186(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28402488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake. Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Willett W; Tinker LF; Subar AF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Arab L; Prentice RL Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 25787264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall web application against urinary recovery biomarkers in a sample of French-speaking adults of the province of Québec, Canada. Paradis F; Lamarche B; Robitaille J; Couillard C; Lafrenière J; Tremblay AJ; Corneau L; Lemieux S Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2022 Feb; 47(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 35057638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of food and nutrient intakes assessed by a food frequency questionnaire among Chinese adults. Zhao D; Gong Y; Huang L; Lv R; Gu Y; Ni C; Zhu D; Yang M; Rong S; Zhang R; Yuan C Nutr J; 2024 Feb; 23(1):23. PubMed ID: 38413971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Arab L; Baer DJ; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Moshfegh AJ; Neuhouser ML; Prentice RL; Schatzkin A; Spiegelman D; Subar AF; Tinker LF; Willett W Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 180(2):172-88. PubMed ID: 24918187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study. Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dietary assessment instruments for preschool children: reliability of parental responses to the 24-hour recall and a food frequency questionnaire. Treiber FA; Leonard SB; Frank G; Musante L; Davis H; Strong WB; Levy M J Am Diet Assoc; 1990 Jun; 90(6):814-20. PubMed ID: 2345254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers. Park Y; Dodd KW; Kipnis V; Thompson FE; Potischman N; Schoeller DA; Baer DJ; Midthune D; Troiano RP; Bowles H; Subar AF Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Jan; 107(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 29381789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology. Carroll RJ; Midthune D; Subar AF; Shumakovich M; Freedman LS; Thompson FE; Kipnis V Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 22273536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility and relative validity of energy and macronutrient intake of a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Bohlscheid-Thomas S; Hoting I; Boeing H; Wahrendorf J Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S71-81. PubMed ID: 9126535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of Absolute Intake and Nutrient Density of Protein, Potassium, and Sodium Assessed by Various Dietary Assessment Methods: An Exploratory Study. Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hulshof PJM; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Hollman PCH; van Dijk G; Feskens EJM; de Vries JHM Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of a New Statistical Model for Measurement Error to the Evaluation of Dietary Self-report Instruments. Freedman LS; Midthune D; Carroll RJ; Commins JM; Arab L; Baer DJ; Moler JE; Moshfegh AJ; Neuhouser ML; Prentice RL; Rhodes D; Spiegelman D; Subar AF; Tinker LF; Willett W; Kipnis V Epidemiology; 2015 Nov; 26(6):925-33. PubMed ID: 26360372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Validated in Hispanic Infants and Toddlers Aged 0 to 24 Months. Palacios C; Rivas-Tumanyan S; Santiago-Rodríguez EJ; Sinigaglia O; Ríos EM; Campos M; Diaz B; Willett W J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 Apr; 117(4):526-535.e9. PubMed ID: 28188114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of Energy and Nutrition Intake in Japanese Elderly Individuals Estimated Based on a Short Food Frequency Questionnaire Compared against a 7-day Dietary Record: The Kyoto-Kameoka Study. Watanabe D; Nanri H; Yoshida T; Yamaguchi M; Sugita M; Nozawa Y; Okabe Y; Itoi A; Goto C; Yamada Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Kobayashi H; Kimura M; Kyoto-Kameoka Study Group KS Nutrients; 2019 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 30909514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diet quality of Montreal-area adults needs improvement: estimates from a self-administered food frequency questionnaire furnishing a dietary indicator score. Shatenstein B; Nadon S; Godin C; Ferland G J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Aug; 105(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 16182642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of a Dietary Questionnaire Assessed by Comparison With Multiple Weighed Dietary Records or 24-Hour Recalls. Yuan C; Spiegelman D; Rimm EB; Rosner BA; Stampfer MJ; Barnett JB; Chavarro JE; Subar AF; Sampson LK; Willett WC Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 185(7):570-584. PubMed ID: 28338828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dietary Assessment in the MetaCardis Study: Development and Relative Validity of an Online Food Frequency Questionnaire. Verger EO; Armstrong P; Nielsen T; Chakaroun R; Aron-Wisnewsky J; Gøbel RJ; Schütz T; Delaere F; Gausseres N; Clément K; Holmes BA; J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 Jun; 117(6):878-888. PubMed ID: 28024800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Schatzkin A; Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Midthune D; Subar AF; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Troiano RP; Freedman LS Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):1054-62. PubMed ID: 14681273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods. Kroke A; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Voss S; Möseneder J; Thielecke F; Noack R; Boeing H Am J Clin Nutr; 1999 Oct; 70(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 10500011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]