BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29917162)

  • 1. N-terminal domain of human uracil DNA glycosylase (hUNG2) promotes targeting to uracil sites adjacent to ssDNA-dsDNA junctions.
    Weiser BP; Rodriguez G; Cole PA; Stivers JT
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Aug; 46(14):7169-7178. PubMed ID: 29917162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Replication Protein A Enhances Kinetics of Uracil DNA Glycosylase on ssDNA and Across DNA Junctions: Explored with a DNA Repair Complex Produced with SpyCatcher/SpyTag Ligation.
    Greenwood SN; Kulkarni RS; Mikhail M; Weiser BP
    Chembiochem; 2023 May; 24(10):e202200765. PubMed ID: 36883884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2) stimulation by replication protein A (RPA) at ssDNA-dsDNA junctions.
    Weiser BP
    Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom; 2020 Mar; 1868(3):140347. PubMed ID: 31866506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. hUNG2 is the major repair enzyme for removal of uracil from U:A matches, U:G mismatches, and U in single-stranded DNA, with hSMUG1 as a broad specificity backup.
    Kavli B; Sundheim O; Akbari M; Otterlei M; Nilsen H; Skorpen F; Aas PA; Hagen L; Krokan HE; Slupphaug G
    J Biol Chem; 2002 Oct; 277(42):39926-36. PubMed ID: 12161446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RPA2 winged-helix domain facilitates UNG-mediated removal of uracil from ssDNA; implications for repair of mutagenic uracil at the replication fork.
    Kavli B; Iveland TS; Buchinger E; Hagen L; Liabakk NB; Aas PA; Obermann TS; Aachmann FL; Slupphaug G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Apr; 49(7):3948-3966. PubMed ID: 33784377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RPA guides UNG to uracil in ssDNA to facilitate antibody class switching and repair of mutagenic uracil at the replication fork.
    Hayran AB; Liabakk NB; Aas PA; Kusnierczyk A; Vågbø CB; Sarno A; Iveland TS; Chawla K; Zahn A; Di Noia JM; Slupphaug G; Kavli B
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 Jan; 52(2):784-800. PubMed ID: 38000394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition for DNA binding between the genome protector replication protein A and the genome modifying APOBEC3 single-stranded DNA deaminases.
    Wong L; Sami A; Chelico L
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Nov; 50(21):12039-12057. PubMed ID: 36444883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualization of uracils created by APOBEC3A using UdgX shows colocalization with RPA at stalled replication forks.
    Stewart JA; Schauer G; Bhagwat AS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Nov; 48(20):e118. PubMed ID: 33074285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA translocation by human uracil DNA glycosylase: the case of single-stranded DNA and clustered uracils.
    Schonhoft JD; Stivers JT
    Biochemistry; 2013 Apr; 52(15):2536-44. PubMed ID: 23506270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The UNG2 Arg88Cys variant abrogates RPA-mediated recruitment of UNG2 to single-stranded DNA.
    Torseth K; Doseth B; Hagen L; Olaisen C; Liabakk NB; Græsmann H; Durandy A; Otterlei M; Krokan HE; Kavli B; Slupphaug G
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2012 Jun; 11(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 22521144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The N-terminal domain of uracil-DNA glycosylase: Roles for disordered regions.
    Perkins JL; Zhao L
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2021 May; 101():103077. PubMed ID: 33640758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil.
    Doseth B; Ekre C; Slupphaug G; Krokan HE; Kavli B
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2012 Jun; 11(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 22483865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. G-quadruplex DNA structures can interfere with uracil glycosylase activity in vitro.
    Holton NW; Larson ED
    Mutagenesis; 2016 Jul; 31(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 26671821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG1 isoform variant supports class switch recombination and repairs nuclear genomic uracil.
    Sarno A; Lundbæk M; Liabakk NB; Aas PA; Mjelle R; Hagen L; Sousa MML; Krokan HE; Kavli B
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 May; 47(9):4569-4585. PubMed ID: 30838409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disordered N-Terminal Domain of Human Uracil DNA Glycosylase (hUNG2) Enhances DNA Translocation.
    Rodriguez G; Esadze A; Weiser BP; Schonhoft JD; Cole PA; Stivers JT
    ACS Chem Biol; 2017 Sep; 12(9):2260-2263. PubMed ID: 28787572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strand-biased cytosine deamination at the replication fork causes cytosine to thymine mutations in Escherichia coli.
    Bhagwat AS; Hao W; Townes JP; Lee H; Tang H; Foster PL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Feb; 113(8):2176-81. PubMed ID: 26839411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) activities in Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens: characterization of a new class of UDG with broad substrate specificity.
    Chembazhi UV; Patil VV; Sah S; Reeve W; Tiwari RP; Woo E; Varshney U
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jun; 45(10):5863-5876. PubMed ID: 28369586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deficient uracil base excision repair leads to persistent dUMP in HIV proviruses during infection of monocytes and macrophages.
    Meshesha M; Esadze A; Cui J; Churgulia N; Sahu SK; Stivers JT
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235012. PubMed ID: 32663205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replication protein A interactions with DNA. 2. Characterization of double-stranded DNA-binding/helix-destabilization activities and the role of the zinc-finger domain in DNA interactions.
    Lao Y; Lee CG; Wold MS
    Biochemistry; 1999 Mar; 38(13):3974-84. PubMed ID: 10194309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-replicative base excision repair in replication foci.
    Otterlei M; Warbrick E; Nagelhus TA; Haug T; Slupphaug G; Akbari M; Aas PA; Steinsbekk K; Bakke O; Krokan HE
    EMBO J; 1999 Jul; 18(13):3834-44. PubMed ID: 10393198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.