159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29921852)
1. Microsoft's purchase of GitHub leaves some scientists uneasy.
Silver A
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):353. PubMed ID: 29921852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recruiters and industry. Microsoft's European perspective.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):938. PubMed ID: 15829973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Web widget nudges scientists to share their data.
Singh Chawla D
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7597):136. PubMed ID: 27078571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Seven ways scientists handle technology challenges in resource-poor settings.
Choi CQ
Nature; 2019 May; 569(7754):147-148. PubMed ID: 31043720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Annotating the scholarly web.
Perkel JM
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7580):153-4. PubMed ID: 26632591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Google unveils search engine for open data.
Castelvecchi D
Nature; 2018 Sep; 561(7722):161-162. PubMed ID: 30206390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Democratic databases: science on GitHub.
Perkel J
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7623):127-128. PubMed ID: 27708327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Collaborative transition to open access publishing by scholarly societies.
Naim K; Brundy C; Samberg RG
Mol Biol Cell; 2021 Feb; 32(4):311-313. PubMed ID: 33587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BioRxiv preprint server gets cash boost from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
Callaway E
Nature; 2017 Apr; 545(7652):18. PubMed ID: 28470210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Secrecy is increasing in step with competition.
Walsh JP; Hong W
Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6934):801-2. PubMed ID: 12712166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Why some researchers oppose unrestricted sharing of coronavirus genome data.
Maxmen A
Nature; 2021 May; 593(7858):176-177. PubMed ID: 33953391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [New forms of publication. What is the place of printed journals?].
Pulido M
Med Clin (Barc); 2015 Aug; 145(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 26077275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. EU copyright reforms draw fire from scientists.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7699):14-15. PubMed ID: 29620761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Data sharing: An open mind on open data.
Gewin V
Nature; 2016 Jan; 529(7584):117-9. PubMed ID: 26744755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Everyone should decide how their digital data are used - not just tech companies.
Sadowski J; Viljoen S; Whittaker M
Nature; 2021 Jul; 595(7866):169-171. PubMed ID: 34211184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Don't let Europe's open-science dream drift.
Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):451. PubMed ID: 28640285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biologists urged to hug a preprint.
Callaway E; Powell K
Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7590):265. PubMed ID: 26887471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Make scientific data FAIR.
Stall S; Yarmey L; Cutcher-Gershenfeld J; Hanson B; Lehnert K; Nosek B; Parsons M; Robinson E; Wyborn L
Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7759):27-29. PubMed ID: 31164768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Indonesian scientists embrace preprint server.
Shih I
Nature; 2018 Jan; 553(7687):139. PubMed ID: 29323327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. From the Editor: The Journey to Open Access.
Groom RC
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2015 Sep; 47(3):143. PubMed ID: 26543246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
