183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29921857)
1. How will you judge me if not by impact factor?
Tregoning J
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):345. PubMed ID: 29921857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
Ploegh H
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
Catlow R
Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students?
Sanchis-Gomar F
EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dear DORA.
Jacobs H
EMBO Rep; 2013 Nov; 14(11):947. PubMed ID: 24169601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition: Build a reputation.
Woolston C
Nature; 2015 May; 521(7550):113-5. PubMed ID: 25961086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What's next for Registered Reports?
Chambers C
Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):187-189. PubMed ID: 31506624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Future impact: Predicting scientific success.
Acuna DE; Allesina S; Kording KP
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):201-2. PubMed ID: 22972278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review: Close inspection.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.
Connerade JP
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark.
Kwok R
Nature; 2013 Aug; 500(7463):491-3. PubMed ID: 23977678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact factor and its role in academic promotion.
Brusasco V; Dinh-Xuan AT; Leff AR; Adler KB; Glenny RW; Dempsey JA; Levy ML; Panettieri R; Reddel HK; Singh D; Virchow JC
Eur Respir J; 2009 Dec; 34(6):1499-500. PubMed ID: 19948921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals.
Sebire NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 19035541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
Brookfield J
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Let's move beyond the rhetoric: it's time to change how we judge research.
Curry S
Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7691):147. PubMed ID: 29420505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact factor and its role in academic promotion.
Leff AR
Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2009 Aug; 6(4):337. PubMed ID: 19675343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Swift publication would reward good reviewers.
Koonin EV
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):374. PubMed ID: 12660754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A better measure of research from the global south.
Lebel J; McLean R
Nature; 2018 Jul; 559(7712):23-26. PubMed ID: 29973734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
