These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29921857)

  • 21. Impact factor and its role in academic promotion.
    Adler KB
    Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2009 Aug; 41(2):127. PubMed ID: 19620407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Count on me.
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):177. PubMed ID: 22972255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health tips for research groups.
    Norris D; Dirnagl U; Zigmond MJ; Thompson-Peer K; Chow TT
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):302-304. PubMed ID: 29769687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fund ideas, not pedigree, to find fresh insight.
    Sinkjær T
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):143. PubMed ID: 29517033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Q&A Jane Harding: individual approach.
    Harding J; Mallapaty S
    Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S82-3. PubMed ID: 25054858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
    Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off.
    Dance A
    Nature; 2023 Feb; 614(7948):581-583. PubMed ID: 36781962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
    List A
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ratings games.
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):889-90. PubMed ID: 16107794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The secrets of success.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Judge a paper on its own merits, not its journal's.
    Zhang SD
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Training peer reviewers.
    Mackey DA
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.
    Gibson TA
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful.
    Werner R
    Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7534):245. PubMed ID: 25592498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.