These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
30. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science. Guglielmi G Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off. Dance A Nature; 2023 Feb; 614(7948):581-583. PubMed ID: 36781962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed. List A Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback. Korngreen A Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The secrets of success. Smaglik P Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Judge a paper on its own merits, not its journal's. Zhang SD Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Training peer reviewers. Mackey DA Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality. Gibson TA Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful. Werner R Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7534):245. PubMed ID: 25592498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]