163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29923012)
1. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy with benign indication: a national cohort study in Taiwan.
Huang HK; Ding DC
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1669-1674. PubMed ID: 29923012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery after native tissue vault suspension at hysterectomy-A prospective cohort study.
Bonde L; Østergaard L; Fosbøl EL; Møller LA; Ottesen B; Gislason GH; Gimbel H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():144-150. PubMed ID: 31284088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery.
Forsgren C; Lundholm C; Johansson AL; Cnattingius S; Zetterström J; Altman D
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jan; 23(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21850508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Lykke R; Blaakær J; Ottesen B; Gimbel H
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 26049977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy: A 10-year national follow-up study.
Kuittinen T; Tulokas S; Rahkola-Soisalo P; Brummer T; Jalkanen J; Tomas E; Mäkinen J; Sjöberg J; Härkki P; Mentula M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):556-566. PubMed ID: 37014706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study.
Vermeulen CKM; Veen J; Adang C; van Leijsen SAL; Coolen AWM; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):841-850. PubMed ID: 33170314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysterectomy technique and risk of pelvic organ prolapse repair: a Danish nationwide cohort study.
Lykke R; Løwenstein E; Blaakær J; Gimbel H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 296(3):527-531. PubMed ID: 28733916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelvic organ prolapse following hysterectomy on benign indication: a nationwide, nulliparous cohort study.
Husby KR; Gradel KO; Klarskov N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 226(3):386.e1-386.e9. PubMed ID: 34688595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of pelvic organ prolapse repair subsequent to hysterectomy: a comparison between radical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy.
Lykke R; Blaakær J; Ottesen B; Gimbel H
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 May; 28(5):745-749. PubMed ID: 27752747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age at hysterectomy as a predictor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Lykke R; Blaakær J; Ottesen B; Gimbel H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):751-5. PubMed ID: 26564221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Forde JC; Chughtai B; Anger JT; Mao J; Sedrakyan A
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 28091710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study.
Tolstrup CK; Husby KR; Lose G; Kopp TI; Viborg PH; Kesmodel US; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):431-440. PubMed ID: 29288346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function after abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Koroglu N; Aslan Cetin B; Akca A; Turan G; Temel Yuksel I; Safak Yıldırım I; Yetkin Yıldırım G
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(10):553-557. PubMed ID: 30393843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The incidence and risk factors of occult malignancy in patients receiving vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Ryu SM; Cho JS; Kong MK; Bai SW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Nov; 34(11):2719-2724. PubMed ID: 37401960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association Between Concomitant Hysterectomy and Repeat Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in a Cohort of Nearly 100,000 Women.
Dallas K; Elliott CS; Syan R; Sohlberg E; Enemchukwu E; Rogo-Gupta L
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 132(6):1328-1336. PubMed ID: 30334856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience.
Mairesse S; Chazard E; Giraudet G; Cosson M; Bartolo S
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 31912174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysterectomy on benign indication and risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A national matched cohort study.
Aagesen AH; Klarskov N; Gradel KO; Husby KR
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jun; 102(6):774-781. PubMed ID: 37013371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysterectomy associated with de novo lower urinary tract symptoms in a Taiwanese population: a nationwide, population-based study.
Li PC; Huang HK; Ding DC
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1711-1717. PubMed ID: 30357471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
