220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29923482)
1. Comparison of outcomes following intersphincteric resection vs low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review.
Ursi P; Santoro A; Gemini A; Arezzo A; Pironi D; Renzi C; Cirocchi R; Di Matteo FM; Maturo A; D'Andrea V; Sagar J
G Chir; 2018; 39(3):123-142. PubMed ID: 29923482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Orsenigo E; Di Palo S; Vignali A; Staudacher C
Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S117-20. PubMed ID: 18023571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intersphincteric resection and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in the Indian setting.
Pai VD; De Souza A; Patil P; Engineer R; Arya S; Saklani A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25583650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the long-term anorectal function between laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.
Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
Surg Today; 2018 Oct; 48(10):921-927. PubMed ID: 29752529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection: indications and results.
Scala D; Niglio A; Pace U; Ruffolo F; Rega D; Delrio P
Updates Surg; 2016 Mar; 68(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 27022927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.
Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH
Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
Baek SJ; Al-Asari S; Jeong DH; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Kim NK
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4157-63. PubMed ID: 23708725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with cT1-T2 low rectal cancer.
Shiomi A; Kinugasa Y; Yamaguchi T; Tsukamoto S; Tomioka H; Kagawa H
Dig Surg; 2013; 30(4-6):272-7. PubMed ID: 23970304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical application of intersphincteric resection in the anal-preserving operation for ultra-low rectal carcinoma].
Zuo ZG; Song HY; Li J; Xu C; Zhou ZH; Ni SC; Chen SQ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 31(12):941-4. PubMed ID: 20193339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Bong JW; Seo JH; Kim CW; Park SH; Kim J
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2082-2094. PubMed ID: 31332563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
