These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29923542)

  • 1. Omission of quality assurance during data entry in public health research from India: Is there an elephant in the room?
    Faizi N; Kumar AM; Kazmi S
    Indian J Public Health; 2018; 62(2):150-152. PubMed ID: 29923542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India.
    Gass JD; Misra A; Yadav MNS; Sana F; Singh C; Mankar A; Neal BJ; Fisher-Bowman J; Maisonneuve J; Delaney MM; Kumar K; Singh VP; Sharma N; Gawande A; Semrau K; Hirschhorn LR
    Trials; 2017 Sep; 18(1):418. PubMed ID: 28882167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are randomized trials conducted in China or India biased? A comparative empirical analysis.
    Zhang D; Freemantle N; Cheng KK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 20554429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assurance reviews: how they differ from peer reviews.
    Adams NH
    Qual Assur; 1998; 6(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 10386330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The lack of public health research output from India.
    Dandona L; Sivan YS; Jyothi MN; Bhaskar VS; Dandona R
    BMC Public Health; 2004 Nov; 4():55. PubMed ID: 15563377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard of reporting animal-based experimental research in Indian Journal of Pharmacology.
    Aiman U; Rahman SZ
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2015; 47(5):514-7. PubMed ID: 26600640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Garbage in, Garbage Out: Data Collection, Quality Assessment and Reporting Standards for Social Media Data Use in Health Research, Infodemiology and Digital Disease Detection.
    Kim Y; Huang J; Emery S
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Feb; 18(2):e41. PubMed ID: 26920122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis.
    Sugimoto CR; Ahn YY; Smith E; Macaluso B; Larivière V
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):550-559. PubMed ID: 30739690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A scientometric examination of the water quality research in India.
    Nishy P; Saroja R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):225. PubMed ID: 29549517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical tools in published articles of a public health journal in 2013 and 2014: bibliometric cross-sectional study.
    Arcila Quiceno V; García Restrepo E; Gómez Rúa N; Montenegro Martínez G; Silva Ayçaguer LC
    Medwave; 2015 Aug; 15(7):e6238. PubMed ID: 26460577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of Swedish health economics research.
    Drummond M; Botten G; Häkkinen U; Pedersen KM
    Scand J Public Health Suppl; 2006 Dec; 68():5-43. PubMed ID: 17366872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse.
    Reynolds J; Kizito J; Ezumah N; Mangesho P; Allen E; Chandler C
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2011 Dec; 9():43. PubMed ID: 22182674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials published in Iranian journals: application of the new version of consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
    Nojomi M; Ramezani M; Ghafari-Anvar A
    Arch Iran Med; 2013 Jan; 16(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 23273230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper.
    Kumar PD
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Feb; 47(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 10999090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data management and quality assurance for an International project: the Indo-US Cross-National Dementia Epidemiology Study.
    Pandav R; Mehta A; Belle SH; Martin DE; Chandra V; Dodge HH; Ganguli M
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2002 Jun; 17(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 12112174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature. A systematic analysis of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine over 26 years.
    Latronico N; Botteri M; Minelli C; Zanotti C; Bertolini G; Candiani A
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Sep; 28(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12209283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality science and quality assurance: observations of an environmental scientist.
    Hughes TJ
    Qual Assur; 1999; 7(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11191123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
    Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review.
    Milette K; Roseman M; Thombs BD
    J Psychosom Res; 2011 Mar; 70(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 21334491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.