These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29923639)

  • 1. The revised EEMCO guidance for the in vivo measurement of water in the skin.
    Berardesca E; Loden M; Serup J; Masson P; Rodrigues LM
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Aug; 24(3):351-358. PubMed ID: 29923639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A closed unventilated chamber for the measurement of transepidermal water loss.
    Nuutinen J; Alanen E; Autio P; Lahtinen MR; Harvima I; Lahtinen T
    Skin Res Technol; 2003 May; 9(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 12709124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Closed-chamber transepidermal water loss measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance.
    Imhof RE; De Jesus ME; Xiao P; Ciortea LI; Berg EP
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Apr; 31(2):97-118. PubMed ID: 19175433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of transepidermal water loss with skin barrier properties in vitro: comparison of three evaporimeters.
    Elkeeb R; Hui X; Chan H; Tian L; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20384878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of the stratum corneum barrier function by transepidermal water loss measurements: comparison between two commercial instruments: Evaporimeter and Tewameter.
    Barel AO; Clarys P
    Skin Pharmacol; 1995; 8(4):186-95. PubMed ID: 7488395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A portable device using a closed chamber system for measuring transepidermal water loss: comparison with the conventional method.
    Tagami H; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi K
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 12005122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaporimetry in man.
    Shah JH; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Aug; 11(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 15998333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models.
    Fluhr JW; Feingold KR; Elias PM
    Exp Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 15(7):483-92. PubMed ID: 16761956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring transepidermal water loss: a comparative in vivo study of condenser-chamber, unventilated-chamber and open-chamber systems.
    Farahmand S; Tien L; Hui X; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Nov; 15(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 19832948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences.
    Rogiers V;
    Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol; 2001; 14(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 11316970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of closed chamber and open chamber evaporimetry.
    Cohen JC; Hartman DG; Garofalo MJ; Basehoar A; Raynor B; Ashbrenner E; Akin FJ
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 19152579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the VapoMeter, a closed unventilated chamber system to assess transepidermal water loss vs. the open chamber Tewameter.
    De Paepe K; Houben E; Adam R; Wiesemann F; Rogiers V
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 15691261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Side-by-side comparison of an open-chamber (TM 300) and a closed-chamber (Vapometer™) transepidermal water loss meter.
    Steiner M; Aikman-Green S; Prescott GJ; Dick FD
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 21492241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a hand-held evaporimeter (VapoMeter) for the measurement of transepidermal water loss in healthy dogs.
    Lau-Gillard PJ; Hill PB; Chesney CJ; Budleigh C; Immonen A
    Vet Dermatol; 2010 Apr; 21(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 19961567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical measurement of the hydration state of the skin surface in vivo.
    Tagami H
    Br J Dermatol; 2014 Sep; 171 Suppl 3():29-33. PubMed ID: 25234175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epidermal calcium release (ECR) in vivo sampled with a simple washout chamber technique.
    Said L; Serup J; Rebel C
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Nov; 8(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 12423540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depth profiling of Stratum corneum hydration in vivo: a comparison between conductance and confocal Raman spectroscopic measurements.
    Boncheva M; de Sterke J; Caspers PJ; Puppels GJ
    Exp Dermatol; 2009 Oct; 18(10):870-6. PubMed ID: 19469890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrical measurement of moisturizing effect on skin hydration and barrier function in psoriasis patients.
    Rim JH; Jo SJ; Park JY; Park BD; Youn JI
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2005 Jul; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 15953083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transepidermal water loss and skin surface hydration in the non invasive assessment of stratum corneum function.
    Berardesca E; Maibach HI
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1990; 38(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 2187664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Hydration Index, Percent Hydration, and Trans-Epidermal Water Loss Measurements for Dermal Exposure and Risk Assessment.
    Sahmel J; Ramachandran G
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2022 Aug; 66(7):907-922. PubMed ID: 35510991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.