These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29924056)

  • 1. Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Jung P; Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; W Choi C; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG; Hong JB; Kim DJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11253. PubMed ID: 29924056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
    de Brouwer EJ; Arbouw ME; van der Zwet WC; van Herwaarden MA; Ledeboer M; Jansman FG; ter Borg F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):835-40. PubMed ID: 22317882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrograde inspection
    Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
    Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled studies.
    Rondonotti E; Zolk O; Amato A; Paggi S; Baccarin A; Spinzi G; Radaelli F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1103-12.e2. PubMed ID: 25053528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 32128607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.
    Moriyama T; Uraoka T; Esaki M; Matsumoto T
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Apr; 27 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 25556542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.
    Dik VK; Moons LM; Siersema PD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 20(9):2200-11. PubMed ID: 24605019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
    Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Position change during colonoscope withdrawal increases polyp and adenoma detection in the right but not in the left side of the colon: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Ball AJ; Johal SS; Riley SA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Sep; 82(3):488-94. PubMed ID: 25910661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
    Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
    East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and efficacy of a novel balloon colonoscope: a prospective cohort study.
    Gralnek IM; Suissa A; Domanov S
    Endoscopy; 2014 Oct; 46(10):883-7. PubMed ID: 25225962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Real-Time Computer-Aided Polyp Detection System (ENDO-AID) on Adenoma Detection in Endoscopists-in-Training: A Randomized Trial.
    Lau LHS; Ho JCL; Lai JCT; Ho AHY; Wu CWK; Lo VWH; Lai CMS; Scheppach MW; Sia F; Ho KHK; Xiao X; Yip TCF; Lam TYT; Kwok HYH; Chan HCH; Lui RN; Chan TT; Wong MTL; Ho MF; Ko RCW; Hon SF; Chu S; Futaba K; Ng SSM; Yip HC; Tang RSY; Wong VWS; Chan FKL; Chiu PWY;
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Mar; 22(3):630-641.e4. PubMed ID: 37918685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.