These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29924534)

  • 1. Local Coherence and Preemptive Digging-in Effects in German.
    Paape D; Vasishth S
    Lang Speech; 2016 Sep; 59(Pt 3):387-403. PubMed ID: 29924534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects.
    Tabor W; Hutchins S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):431-50. PubMed ID: 14979816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Globally Ungrammatical Local Syntactic Constraints on Real-Time Sentence Comprehension: Evidence From the Visual World Paradigm and Reading.
    Kamide Y; Kukona A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2976-2998. PubMed ID: 30341784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery.
    Sturt P
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):477-88. PubMed ID: 17178115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. It's Harder to Break a Relationship When you Commit Long.
    Arai M; Nakamura C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156482. PubMed ID: 27271881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.
    Gordon PC; Hendrick R; Johnson M; Lee Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1304-21. PubMed ID: 17087585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Multiple-Channel Model of Task-Dependent Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Comprehension.
    Logačev P; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Mar; 40(2):266-98. PubMed ID: 25823920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.
    van Schijndel M; Linzen T
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
    Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.
    Gattei CA; Dickey MW; Wainselboim AJ; París L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1981-2007. PubMed ID: 25529525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.
    Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):407-30. PubMed ID: 17352621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension.
    Speer SR; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):965-78. PubMed ID: 9796230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.
    Andrews G; Birney D; Halford GS
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1325-40. PubMed ID: 17225512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adult age differences in wrap-up during sentence comprehension: evidence from ex-Gaussian distributional analyses of reading time.
    Payne BR; Stine-Morrow EA
    Psychol Aging; 2014 Jun; 29(2):213-28. PubMed ID: 24955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.
    Knoeferle P; Crocker MW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2338-71. PubMed ID: 19418379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Surprisal and Locality on Danish Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.
    Balling LW; Kizach J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1119-1136. PubMed ID: 28332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.