128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29925110)
1. Cervical Cancer Registered in Two Developed Regions from Brazil: Upper Limit of Reachable Results from Opportunistic Screening.
Teixeira JC; Maestri CA; Machado HDC; Zeferino LC; Carvalho NS
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 40(6):347-353. PubMed ID: 29925110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence rates and temporal trends of cervical cancer relating to opportunistic screening in two developed metropolitan regions of Brazil: a population-based cohort study.
Teixeira JC; Maestri CA; Machado HDC; Zeferino LC; Carvalho NS
Sao Paulo Med J; 2019; 137(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 31691764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the public health impact of a national guideline on cervical cancer screening: an audit study of a program in Campinas, Brazil.
Vale DB; Menin TL; Bragança JF; Teixeira JC; Cavalcante LA; Zeferino LC
BMC Public Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1492. PubMed ID: 31703661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Success of a cervical cancer screening program: trends in incidence in songkhla, southern Thailand, 1989-2010, and prediction of future incidences to 2030.
Sriplung H; Singkham P; Iamsirithaworn S; Jiraphongsa C; Bilheem S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(22):10003-8. PubMed ID: 25520060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/CIN3), early stage and advanced stage of cervical cancer diagnosis in the Brazilian Amazonian region.
Pontes VB; Martins LFL; Szklo M; Moreira MÂM; Chaves CBP; de Almeida LM
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):342-345. PubMed ID: 31577564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of opportunistic testing in a systematic cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide registry study.
Tranberg M; Larsen MB; Mikkelsen EM; Svanholm H; Andersen B
BMC Public Health; 2015 Jul; 15():681. PubMed ID: 26194007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical Cancer in Khon Kaen, Thailand: Analysis of 1990-2014 Incidence Data and Prediction of Future Trends.
Saenrueang T; Promthet S; Kamsa-Ard S; Pengsaa P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):369-375. PubMed ID: 30803194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of breast cancer and cervical cancer stage distributions in ten newly independent states of the former Soviet Union: a population-based study.
Ryzhov A; Corbex M; Piñeros M; Barchuk A; Andreasyan D; Djanklich S; Ghervas V; Gretsova O; Kaidarova D; Kazanjan K; Mardanli F; Michailovich Y; Ten E; Yaumenenka A; Bray F; Znaor A
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Mar; 22(3):361-369. PubMed ID: 33556324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Population-based Study of Invasive Cervical Cancer Patients in Beijing: 1993-2008.
Wang T; Wu MH; Wu YM; Zhang WY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Dec; 128(24):3298-304. PubMed ID: 26668143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer screening in Teresina, Piauí, Brazil: evaluation study using data of the Cervical Cancer Information System, 2006-2013.
Damacena AM; Luz LL; Mattos IE
Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 28226009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immigration, screening, and cervical cancer incidence: an application of Age-Period-Cohort analysis.
Bucchi D; Chiavarini M; Bianconi F; Galeotti ME; Gili A; Stracci F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Nov; 28(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 30431461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Organization of cervical cancer screening in Campinas and surrounding region, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Zeferino LC; Pinotti JA; Jorge JP; Westin MC; Tambascia JK; Montemor EB
Cad Saude Publica; 2006 Sep; 22(9):1909-14. PubMed ID: 16917588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal trend and associated factors to advanced stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer: analysis of data from hospital based cancer registries in Brazil, 2000-2012.
Renna Junior NL; Silva GAE
Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2018; 27(2):e2017285. PubMed ID: 29742234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the effects of the age-period-birth cohort on cervical cancer mortality in the Brazilian Northeast.
Meira KC; Silva GWDS; Dos Santos J; Guimarães RM; de Souza DLB; Ribeiro GPC; Dantas ESO; Carvalho JBL; Jomar RT; Simões TC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0226258. PubMed ID: 32074101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the National Cervical Screening Programme in New Zealand by age: analysis of cervical cancer trends 1985-2013 in all women and in Māori women.
Smith MA; Edwards S; Canfell K
Cancer Causes Control; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 28986722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer screening coverage in a high-incidence region.
Navarro C; Fonseca AJ; Sibajev A; Souza CI; Araújo DS; Teles DA; Carvalho SG; Cavalcante KW; Rabelo WL
Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():17. PubMed ID: 25741655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trend analysis of the quality indicators for the Brazilian cervical cancer screening programme by region and state from 2006 to 2013.
Costa RFA; Longatto-Filho A; de Lima Vazquez F; Pinheiro C; Zeferino LC; Fregnani JHTG
BMC Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):126. PubMed ID: 29394915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening in Greenland, 1997-2011: Screening coverage and trends in the incidence of high-grade cervical lesions.
Holst S; Wohlfahrt J; Kjær SK; Kamper-Jørgensen M; Kern P; Andersson M; Koch A
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Nov; 143(2):307-312. PubMed ID: 27018418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical morbidity in Alsace, France: results from a regional organized cervical cancer screening program.
Baldauf JJ; Fender M; Bergeron C; Marrer E; Velten M; Pradat P; Arbyn M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jan; 28(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 29135538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance indicators in a newly established organized cervical screening programme: registry-based analysis in the Czech Republic.
Májek O; Dušková J; Dvořák V; Beková A; Klimeš D; Blaha M; Anttila A; Dušek L
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2017 May; 26(3):232-239. PubMed ID: 26908155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
