288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29925763)
1. Wear Resistance of 3D Printing Resin Material Opposing Zirconia and Metal Antagonists.
Park JM; Ahn JS; Cha HS; Lee JH
Materials (Basel); 2018 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 29925763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wear resistance of 3D-printed denture tooth resin opposing zirconia and metal antagonists.
Cha HS; Park JM; Kim TH; Lee JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 31784192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wear of 3D printed and CAD/CAM milled interim resin materials after chewing simulation.
Myagmar G; Lee JH; Ahn JS; Yeo IL; Yoon HI; Han JS
J Adv Prosthodont; 2021 Jun; 13(3):144-151. PubMed ID: 34234924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear Resistance of 3D Printed and Prefabricated Denture Teeth Opposing Zirconia.
Pham DM; Gonzalez MD; Ontiveros JC; Kasper FK; Frey GN; Belles DM
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):804-810. PubMed ID: 33486808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM 3D-printed zirconia, CAD/CAM milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate ultra-thin occlusal veneers on molars.
Ioannidis A; Bomze D; Hämmerle CHF; Hüsler J; Birrer O; Mühlemann S
Dent Mater; 2020 Apr; 36(4):e109-e116. PubMed ID: 31992483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of low-temperature degradation on the wear characteristics of zirconia against polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material.
Hao Z; Ma Y; Liu W; Meng Y; Nakamura K; Shen J; Wang H
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 29724551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-body wear of 3D printed temporary materials.
Kessler A; Reymus M; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
Dent Mater; 2019 Dec; 35(12):1805-1812. PubMed ID: 31727446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D Printing of Resin Material for Denture Artificial Teeth: Chipping and Indirect Tensile Fracture Resistance.
Chung YJ; Park JM; Kim TH; Ahn JS; Cha HS; Lee JH
Materials (Basel); 2018 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 30248955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D-printing zirconia implants; a dream or a reality? An in-vitro study evaluating the dimensional accuracy, surface topography and mechanical properties of printed zirconia implant and discs.
Osman RB; van der Veen AJ; Huiberts D; Wismeijer D; Alharbi N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():521-528. PubMed ID: 28846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-body wear and surface hardness of occlusal splint materials.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S; Lassila L
Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):916-922. PubMed ID: 36288940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of wear behaviour of various occlusal splint materials and manufacturing processes.
Grymak A; Waddell JN; Aarts JM; Ma S; Choi JJE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105053. PubMed ID: 34998068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.
Tahayeri A; Morgan M; Fugolin AP; Bompolaki D; Athirasala A; Pfeifer CS; Ferracane JL; Bertassoni LE
Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 29110921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wear Resistance of Additively Manufactured Resin with Different Printing Parameters and Postpolymerization Conditions.
Wan Q; Lee JH; Daher R; Karasan D; Myagmar G; Sailer I
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):55-62. PubMed ID: 38489221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear and Fracture Resistance of 3D-Printed Denture Teeth: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
Gad MM; Alghamdi R; Al-Ghamdi R; Al-Jefri A; Akhtar S; Khan SQ; Alalawi H; Al-Qarni FD
J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35411606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture load of 3D printed PEEK inlays compared with milled ones, direct resin composite fillings, and sound teeth.
Prechtel A; Stawarczyk B; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Reymus M
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3457-3466. PubMed ID: 31989370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material.
Mayer J; Stawarczyk B; Vogt K; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Reymus M
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Oct; 25(10):5987-5996. PubMed ID: 33811531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics.
Park GS; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Seo DG
Materials (Basel); 2019 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 31395801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Post-Printing Conditions on the Mechanical and Optical Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Resin.
Lassila L; Mangoush E; He J; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S
Polymers (Basel); 2024 Jun; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 38932063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
