These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29926104)

  • 1. The Value of Clinical Colorectal Cancer Registries in Colorectal Cancer Research: A Systematic Review.
    MacCallum C; Skandarajah A; Gibbs P; Hayes I
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Sep; 153(9):841-849. PubMed ID: 29926104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The first 1000 patients on an internet-based colorectal neoplasia database across private and public medicine in Australia: development of a binational model for the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand.
    McMurrick PJ; Oliva K; Carne P; Reid C; Polglase A; Bell S; Farmer KC; Ranchod P
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24401877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of the intestinal microbiome in colorectal cancer surgery outcomes.
    Lauka L; Reitano E; Carra MC; Gaiani F; Gavriilidis P; Brunetti F; de'Angelis GL; Sobhani I; de'Angelis N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 17(1):204. PubMed ID: 31791356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying a common data dictionary across colorectal cancer outcome registries: A mapping exercise to identify opportunities for data dictionary harmonisation.
    Mohan HM; Sijmons JML; Maida JV; Walker K; Kuryba A; Syk I; Iversen LH; Hariot A; Ko CY; Tanis PJ; Tollenaar RAEM; Avellaneda N; Smart P;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 50(2):107937. PubMed ID: 38232520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
    Iversen LH
    Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review.
    Hoque DM; Kumari V; Ruseckaite R; Romero L; Evans SM
    BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010654. PubMed ID: 27118288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Epidemiological Studies of Colorectal Cancer by Record Linkage of Cancer Registries and Biospecimen Data: A Systematic Review.
    Kataoka A; Ota M; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ito Y
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Dec; 24(12):4017-4023. PubMed ID: 38156833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
    Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anastomotic leakage after resection of colorectal cancer generates prodigious use of hospital resources.
    Frye J; Bokey EL; Chapuis PH; Sinclair G; Dent OF
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Nov; 11(9):917-20. PubMed ID: 19175646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of biobanks on research outcomes in rare diseases: a systematic review.
    Garcia M; Downs J; Russell A; Wang W
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2018 Nov; 13(1):202. PubMed ID: 30419920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior resection for rectal cancer in Sweden: validation of a registry-based method to determine long-term stoma outcome.
    Holmgren K; Haapamäki MM; Matthiessen P; Rutegård J; Rutegård M
    Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 30306825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgery using different databases.
    Reinke CE; Showalter S; Mahmoud NN; Kelz RR
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 May; 56(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 23575404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia: the National Colorectal Cancer Care Survey.
    McGrath DR; Leong DC; Armstrong BK; Spigelman AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2004; 74(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 14725707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.