These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29926760)

  • 1. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context-Specific Proportion Congruency Effects: An Episodic Learning Account and Computational Model.
    Schmidt JR
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1806. PubMed ID: 27899907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.
    Spinelli G; Krishna K; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2007-2033. PubMed ID: 32658541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proportion congruency and practice: A contingency learning account of asymmetric list shifting effects.
    Schmidt JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1496-505. PubMed ID: 27585071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation to conflict frequency without contingency and temporal learning: Evidence from the picture-word interference task.
    Spinelli G; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):995-1014. PubMed ID: 31144859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of context-driven control revealed through the analysis of sequential congruency effects.
    Hutcheon TG; Spieler DH; Eldar M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jul; 178():107-113. PubMed ID: 28666107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect.
    Abrahamse EL; Duthoo W; Notebaert W; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1552-62. PubMed ID: 23565794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is cued by faces in the face-based context-specific proportion congruent manipulation?
    Hutcheon T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1248-1263. PubMed ID: 35174463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Weissman DH; Jiang J; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2022-2037. PubMed ID: 25089574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contingency learning is not affected by conflict experience: Evidence from a task conflict-free, item-specific Stroop paradigm.
    Levin Y; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():39-45. PubMed ID: 26720099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm.
    Schmidt JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Jan; 142(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 23261421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):675-700. PubMed ID: 35787140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying stimuli that cue multiple responses triggers the congruency sequence effect independent of response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Colter KM; Grant LD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):677-689. PubMed ID: 28095005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional control of response selection in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1315-24. PubMed ID: 26076177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-out for conflict monitoring theory: Preventing rhythmic biases eliminates the list-level proportion congruent effect.
    Schmidt JR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 27977230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.