133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29927337)
21. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
Skaane P
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis.
Yun SJ; Ryu CW; Rhee SJ; Ryu JK; Oh JY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):557-569. PubMed ID: 28516226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.
Roganovic D; Djilas D; Vujnovic S; Pavic D; Stojanov D
Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 15(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 26614855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of breast cancer presenting as a mass in women with dense breasts - digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
Babkina TM; Dykan IM; Gurando AV; Suleimenova DM; Kozarenko TM; Bozhok YM; Stuley VA
Exp Oncol; 2020 Sep; 42(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 32996743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall.
Marinovich ML; Hunter KE; Macaskill P; Houssami N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Sep; 110(9):942-949. PubMed ID: 30107542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.
Förnvik D; Zackrisson S; Ljungberg O; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 20105090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative accuracy of preoperative tumor size assessment on mammography, sonography, and MRI: Is the accuracy affected by breast density or cancer subtype?
Leddy R; Irshad A; Metcalfe A; Mabalam P; Abid A; Ackerman S; Lewis M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Jan; 44(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 26294391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for breast cancer screening and for assessment of screen-recalled findings: review of the evidence.
Li T; Marinovich ML; Houssami N
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2018 Aug; 18(8):785-791. PubMed ID: 29847744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Detectability on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-Dimensional Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts.
Lee SH; Jang MJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Rim J; Chang JM; Kim B; Choi HY
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30627022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).
Amato F; Bicchierai G; Cirone D; Depretto C; Di Naro F; Vanzi E; Scaperrotta G; Bartolotta TV; Miele V; Nori J
Radiol Med; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 31773458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics.
Regen-Tuero HC; Ram S; Gass JS; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 34523954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Dang PA; Wang A; Senapati GM; Ip IK; Lacson R; Khorasani R; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):701-706. PubMed ID: 31613659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
