414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29927780)
1. Reducing Simulated Channel Interaction Reveals Differences in Phoneme Identification Between Children and Adults With Normal Hearing.
Jahn KN; DiNino M; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):295-311. PubMed ID: 29927780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of spectral smearing on the identification of pure F0 intonation contours in vocoder simulations of cochlear implants.
van de Velde DJ; Dritsakis G; Frijns JH; van Heuven VJ; Schiller NO
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 25001247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 12195176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vowel and consonant confusions from spectrally manipulated stimuli designed to simulate poor cochlear implant electrode-neuron interfaces.
DiNino M; Wright RA; Winn MB; Bierer JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4404. PubMed ID: 28039993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced Channel Interaction Improves Timbre Recognition Under Vocoder Simulation of Cochlear Implant Processing.
Yüksel M; Çiprut A
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Apr; 45(4):e297-e306. PubMed ID: 38437807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels.
Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2908-25. PubMed ID: 17139748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
Loizou PC; Poroy O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
Richter ME; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.
Jaekel BN; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 May; 60(5):1398-1416. PubMed ID: 28395319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
