These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29928004)
21. Questionnaires for Measuring Refractive Surgery Outcomes. Kandel H; Khadka J; Lundström M; Goggin M; Pesudovs K J Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(6):416-424. PubMed ID: 28586503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Are standard instruments valid for the assessment of quality of life and symptoms in glaucoma? Lamoureux EL; Ferraro JG; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Keeffe JE Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):789-96. PubMed ID: 17700342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Translation, cultural adaptation, and Rasch analysis of the visual function (VF-14) questionnaire. Khadka J; Huang J; Mollazadegan K; Gao R; Chen H; Zhang S; Wang Q; Pesudovs K Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jun; 55(7):4413-20. PubMed ID: 24917139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes. Mallinson T Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 17700332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An interval-scaled scoring algorithm for visual function questionnaires. Massof RW Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):E690-705. PubMed ID: 17700325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vision and Quality of Life Index: validation of the Indian version using Rasch analysis. Gothwal VK; Bagga DK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4871-81. PubMed ID: 23800765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after presbyopic lens exchange with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Chang JS; Ng JC; Lau SY J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):468-74. PubMed ID: 22716033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Computer-Vision Symptom Scale (CVSS17): development and initial validation. González-Pérez M; Susi R; Antona B; Barrio A; González E Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jun; 55(7):4504-11. PubMed ID: 24938516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Refractive lens exchange for a multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section in mild to moderate anisometropic amblyopic patients. de Wit DW; Diaz JM; Moore TC; Moore JE J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 22920503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of multifocal soft contact lenses used to slow myopia progression on quality of vision in young adults. Kang P; McAlinden C; Wildsoet CF Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 95(1):e43-e53. PubMed ID: 27495880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling. Garamendi E; Pesudovs K; Stevens MJ; Elliott DB Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1375-83. PubMed ID: 16105674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determinants of patient satisfaction and function related to vision following cataract surgery in eyes with no visually consequential ocular co-morbidity. Kirwan C; Nolan JM; Stack J; Moore TC; Beatty S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 253(10):1735-44. PubMed ID: 25968132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and validation of an instrument to assess job satisfaction in eye-care personnel. Paudel P; Cronjé S; O'Connor PM; Khadka J; Rao GN; Holden BA Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Nov; 100(6):683-689. PubMed ID: 27862287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multiplicative rating scales do not enable measurement of vision-related quality of life. Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 21198834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rasch analysis reveals problems with multiplicative scoring in the macular disease quality of life questionnaire. Finger RP; Fenwick E; Pesudovs K; Marella M; Lamoureux EL; Holz FG Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2351-7. PubMed ID: 22968142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rasch analysis of visual function and quality of life questionnaires. Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 86(10):1160-8. PubMed ID: 19741562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vision impairment and major causes of vision loss impacts on vision-specific functioning independent of socioeconomic factors. Chiang PP; Zheng Y; Wong TY; Lamoureux EL Ophthalmology; 2013 Feb; 120(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 23149127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The psychometric validity of the NEI VFQ-25 for use in a low-vision population. Marella M; Pesudovs K; Keeffe JE; O'Connor PM; Rees G; Lamoureux EL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2878-84. PubMed ID: 20089878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]