236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29929589)
1. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
Walsh T
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J; Huynh M
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
Valenstein PN
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.
Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Dendukuri N; Dhand NK; Toft N; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():37-47. PubMed ID: 28237234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions.
de Groot JA; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Moons KG
BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4770. PubMed ID: 21810869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.
Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):2987-3003. PubMed ID: 10544302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
Albert PS
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.
Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson K; Graziadio S; Vale L; Allen AJ
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223832. PubMed ID: 31603953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chapter 9: options for summarizing medical test performance in the absence of a "gold standard".
Trikalinos TA; Balion CM
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S67-75. PubMed ID: 22648677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
