200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29930787)
1. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis.
Yang H; Park C; Shin JH; Yun KD; Lim HP; Park SW; Chung H
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 10(3):184-190. PubMed ID: 29930787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study.
Mei ML; Chen YM; Li H; Chu CH
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jan; 15(1):3. PubMed ID: 26758615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location.
Magne P; Oganesyan T
Quintessence Int; 2009 May; 40(5):363-70. PubMed ID: 19582240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis.
Yamanel K; Caglar A; Gülsahi K; Ozden UA
Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20019416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of material and loading location on stress distribution of inlays.
Costa VCD; Machado AC; Soares PV; Raposo LH; Vasconcellos AB
Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 34143589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resistance against Fracture in Teeth Managed by Root Canal Treatment on Restoring with Onlays, Inlays, and Endocrowns: A Comparative Analysis.
Huda I; Pandey A; Kumar N; Sinha S; Kavita K; Raj R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jul; 22(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 34615787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low and high viscosity bulk-fill composite resins stress distribution in primary molar tooth inlay cavity.
Guler MS
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Mar; 27(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 37216569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
Magne P; Belser UC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
Liu X; Fok A; Li H
Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of ceramic thickness and composite bases on stress distribution of inlays--a finite element analysis.
Durand LB; Guimarães JC; Monteiro Junior S; Baratieri LN
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 25831105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
