These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29931702)

  • 1. Integrating co-evolutionary signals and other properties of residue pairs to distinguish biological interfaces from crystal contacts.
    Hu J; Liu HF; Sun J; Wang J; Liu R
    Protein Sci; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1723-1735. PubMed ID: 29931702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing crystallographic from biological interfaces in protein complexes: role of intermolecular contacts and energetics for classification.
    Elez K; Bonvin AMJJ; Vangone A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(Suppl 15):438. PubMed ID: 30497368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structure-based prediction of post-translational modification cross-talk within proteins using complementary residue- and residue pair-based features.
    Liu HF; Liu R
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 Mar; 21(2):609-620. PubMed ID: 30649184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use B-factor related features for accurate classification between protein binding interfaces and crystal packing contacts.
    Liu Q; Li Z; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S3. PubMed ID: 25522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RBRDetector: improved prediction of binding residues on RNA-binding protein structures using complementary feature- and template-based strategies.
    Yang XX; Deng ZL; Liu R
    Proteins; 2014 Oct; 82(10):2455-71. PubMed ID: 24854765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces.
    Bahadur RP; Chakrabarti P; Rodier F; Janin J
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Feb; 336(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 15095871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity vectors of low-ASA residue pairs in the distinction of protein interactions.
    Liu Q; Li J
    Proteins; 2010 Feb; 78(3):589-602. PubMed ID: 19768686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A structural dissection of large protein-protein crystal packing contacts.
    Luo J; Liu Z; Guo Y; Li M
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14214. PubMed ID: 26370141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the fabric of protein crystals: computational classification of biological interfaces and crystal contacts.
    Capitani G; Duarte JM; Baskaran K; Bliven S; Somody JC
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 26508758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SCOWLP: a web-based database for detailed characterization and visualization of protein interfaces.
    Teyra J; Doms A; Schroeder M; Pisabarro MT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():104. PubMed ID: 16512892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SNBRFinder: A Sequence-Based Hybrid Algorithm for Enhanced Prediction of Nucleic Acid-Binding Residues.
    Yang X; Wang J; Sun J; Liu R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133260. PubMed ID: 26176857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EL_PSSM-RT: DNA-binding residue prediction by integrating ensemble learning with PSSM Relation Transformation.
    Zhou J; Lu Q; Xu R; He Y; Wang H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):379. PubMed ID: 28851273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein-protein interactions leave evolutionary footprints: High molecular coevolution at the core of interfaces.
    Teppa E; Zea DJ; Marino-Buslje C
    Protein Sci; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2438-2444. PubMed ID: 28980349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein binding hot spots and the residue-residue pairing preference: a water exclusion perspective.
    Liu Q; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():244. PubMed ID: 20462403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving accuracy of protein contact prediction using balanced network deconvolution.
    Sun HP; Huang Y; Wang XF; Zhang Y; Shen HB
    Proteins; 2015 Mar; 83(3):485-96. PubMed ID: 25524593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting protein residue-residue contacts using random forests and deep networks.
    Luttrell J; Liu T; Zhang C; Wang Z
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(Suppl 2):100. PubMed ID: 30871477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A PDB-wide, evolution-based assessment of protein-protein interfaces.
    Baskaran K; Duarte JM; Biyani N; Bliven S; Capitani G
    BMC Struct Biol; 2014 Oct; 14():22. PubMed ID: 25326082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces.
    Glaser F; Steinberg DM; Vakser IA; Ben-Tal N
    Proteins; 2001 May; 43(2):89-102. PubMed ID: 11276079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information.
    Ovchinnikov S; Kamisetty H; Baker D
    Elife; 2014 May; 3():e02030. PubMed ID: 24842992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.