132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29932820)
1. Do Men and Women Know What They Want? Sex Differences in Online Daters' Educational Preferences.
Whyte S; Chan HF; Torgler B
Psychol Sci; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 29932820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mate selection among online daters in Shanghai: Why does education matter?
Xiao S; Qian Y
Chin J Sociol; 2020 Oct; 6(4):521-546. PubMed ID: 33240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family size and sex preferences and eventual fertility in Botswana.
Campbell EK; Campbell PG
J Biosoc Sci; 1997 Apr; 29(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 9881130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corrigendum: Do Men and Women Know What They Want? Sex Differences in Online Daters' Educational Preferences.
Psychol Sci; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1895. PubMed ID: 30215568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Being More Educated and Earning More Increases Romantic Interest: Data from 1.8 M Online Daters from 24 Nations.
Jonason PK; Thomas AG
Hum Nat; 2022 Jun; 33(2):115-131. PubMed ID: 35380344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voice pitch modulation in human mate choice.
Pisanski K; Oleszkiewicz A; Plachetka J; Gmiterek M; Reby D
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Dec; 285(1893):20181634. PubMed ID: 30963886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Health, Wealth, and Attractiveness on Romantic Evaluation from Photographs of Faces.
Tskhay KO; Clout JM; Rule NO
Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 28255792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces.
Little AC; Jones BC; Feinberg DR; Perrett DI
Br J Psychol; 2014 Aug; 105(3):364-81. PubMed ID: 25040006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Equilibrium population dynamics when mating is by mutual choice based on age.
Alpern S; Katrantzi I; Ramsey D
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Jun; 94():63-72. PubMed ID: 23541396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.
Schwarz S; Hassebrauck M
Hum Nat; 2012 Dec; 23(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22941269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age difference asymmetry and a two-sex perspective.
Ni Bhrolchain M
Eur J Popul; 1992; 8(1):23-45. PubMed ID: 12158964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample.
Sprecher S; Sullivan Q; Hatfield E
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Jun; 66(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 8046577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intercountry comparisons of labor force trends and of related developments: an overview.
Mincer J
J Labor Econ; 1985 Jan; 3(1 Pt 2):S1-32. PubMed ID: 12267645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers.
Apicella CL; Feinberg DR
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Mar; 276(1659):1077-82. PubMed ID: 19129125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Men's Preferences for Female Facial Femininity Decline With Age.
Marcinkowska UM; Dixson BJ; Kozlov MV; Prasai K; Rantala MJ
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2017 Jan; 72(1):180-186. PubMed ID: 26320118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.
Moore F; Cassidy C; Perrett DI
Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 22947829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
