201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29933214)
1. Effect of inclination and anteversion angles on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implants.
Gao Y; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Chen S; Jin Z
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():48-55. PubMed ID: 29933214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Daily Activities and Position on Kinematics and Contact Mechanics of Dual Mobility Hip Implant.
Gao Y; Zhao X; Chen S; Zhang J; Chen Z; Jin Z
J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():8103523. PubMed ID: 32257086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of friction and clearance on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implant.
Gao Y; Chai W; Wang L; Wang M; Jin Z
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jan; 230(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 26586527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic Hip Kinematics During the Golf Swing After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Hara D; Nakashima Y; Hamai S; Higaki H; Ikebe S; Shimoto T; Yoshimoto K; Iwamoto Y
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):1801-9. PubMed ID: 27037283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle.
Tauviqirrahman M; Ammarullah MI; Jamari J; Saputra E; Winarni TI; Kurniawan FD; Shiddiq SA; van der Heide E
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3564. PubMed ID: 36864170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation.
Higuera Rueda CA; Ferguson DF; Scholl L; Klika AK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):766-771. PubMed ID: 30639282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Hip joint biomechanical analysis of the acetabular anatomical reconstruction and nonanatomical reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip by finite element method].
Zhang H; Zhou YF; Li BW; Li KX; Liu Y; Zhou JS; Zhao JN
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2024 May; 37(5):505-15. PubMed ID: 38778536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo kinematics, component alignment and hardware variables influence on the liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising after total hip arthroplasty.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Hara D; Higaki H; Gondo H; Wang Y; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Komiyama K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):452-459. PubMed ID: 31178276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
Hisatome T; Doi H
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of sliding distance and contact mechanics of hip implant under dynamic walking conditions.
Gao Y; Jin Z; Wang L; Wang M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Jun; 229(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 25963387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mechanical effects of cup inclination and anteversion angle on the bearing surface.
Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Abe T; Tsumura H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 28780593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contact mechanics and occurrence of edge loading in modular metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement during daily activities.
Hua X; Li J; Jin Z; Fisher J
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jun; 38(6):518-25. PubMed ID: 27056255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polyethylene liner motion in dual-mobility hip prostheses: static and dynamic radiostereometry in 16 patients 1 year after operation.
Jørgensen PB; Kaptein BL; Søballe K; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
Acta Orthop; 2022 Mar; 93():375-381. PubMed ID: 35347340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation.
Patil S; Bergula A; Chen PC; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003; 85-A Suppl 4():56-63. PubMed ID: 14652394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics.
Bourget-Murray J; Taneja A; Naserkhaki S; El-Rich M; Adeeb S; Powell J; Johnston K
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252435. PubMed ID: 34043721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement.
Williams D; Royle M; Norton M
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 18823742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
