These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2993394)

  • 1. The role of suppression in psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.
    Jesteadt W; Norton SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 2):365-74. PubMed ID: 2993394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus.
    Jiang D; Palmer AR; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jan; 75(1):380-95. PubMed ID: 8822565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computer model of the auditory-nerve response to forward-masking stimuli.
    Meddis R; O'Mard LP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3787-98. PubMed ID: 16018482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement in informational masking.
    Cao X; Richards VM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 55(4):1135-47. PubMed ID: 22232413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Hoover BM; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
    Rhode WS; Greenberg S
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Feb; 71(2):493-514. PubMed ID: 8176421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the ideal observer to predict performance in perceptual tasks: an example from the auditory temporal masking domain.
    MacDonald JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2639-48. PubMed ID: 22006524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials.
    Salt AN; Vora AR
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 2383213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.
    Oberfeld D; Stahn P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48054. PubMed ID: 23110174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Central factors in the discrimination and identification of complex sounds.
    Watson CS; Foyle DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 2):375-80. PubMed ID: 4031244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of psychophysical release from masking.
    Mott JB; McDonald LP; Sinex DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2682-91. PubMed ID: 2283440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reflection of the characteristics of acoustic signals in the summary synchronized responses of neurons of the auditory system of the cat].
    Radionova EA
    Neirofiziologiia; 1987; 19(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 3574554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.
    Oxenham AJ; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 14716510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers.
    Delgutte B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):791-809. PubMed ID: 2307776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of auditory filter phase response at and below characteristic frequency.
    Oxenham AJ; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):1713-6. PubMed ID: 15898618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors that influence rate-versus-intensity relations in single cochlear nerve fibers of the gerbil.
    Ohlemiller KK; Echteler SM; Siegel JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):274-87. PubMed ID: 1652601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysical suppression of selective portions of pulsation threshold patterns.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 3722005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters.
    Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1089-104. PubMed ID: 11519577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tuning curves and masking functions of auditory-nerve fibers in cat.
    Bauer JW
    Sens Processes; 1978 Jun; 2(2):156-72. PubMed ID: 715469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.