These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29934669)

  • 1. Neointimal formation after carotid artery stenting: phantom and clinical evaluation of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR).
    Yokomachi K; Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Kume S; Sakamoto S; Okazaki T; Kurisu K; Nakamura Y; Baba Y; Iida M; Awai K
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):161-167. PubMed ID: 29934669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent restenosis using model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT angiography: initial experience.
    Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Sakane H; Nakamura Y; Iida M; Baba Y; Fujioka C; Senoo A; Kitagawa T; Yamamoto H; Kihara Y; Awai K
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1082):20170598. PubMed ID: 29022741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction at Coronary CT Angiography.
    Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Sakane H; Fukumoto W; Kaichi Y; Iida M; Baba Y; Kiguchi M; Kihara Y; Tsushima S; Awai K
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):975-981. PubMed ID: 28214228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography.
    Xu J; Wang S; Wang X; Wang Y; Xue H; Yan J; Xu M; Jin Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110388. PubMed ID: 35714492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT angiography after carotid artery stenting: assessment of the utility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Kuya K; Shinohara Y; Sakamoto M; Iwata N; Kishimoto J; Fujii S; Kaminou T; Watanabe T; Ogawa T
    Neuroradiology; 2014 Nov; 56(11):947-53. PubMed ID: 25117504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography.
    Yu S; Zhang L; Zheng J; Xu Y; Chen Y; Song Z
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):96.e1-96.e6. PubMed ID: 27647546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Hybrid Kernel and Iterative Reconstruction on Objective and Subjective Analysis of Lung Nodule Calcification in Low-Dose Chest CT.
    Hong SG; Kang EJ; Park JH; Choi WJ; Lee KN; Kwon HJ; Ha DH; Kim DW; Kim SH; Jo JH; Lee J
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):888-896. PubMed ID: 30174478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative Measurements Versus Receiver Operating Characteristics and Visual Grading Regression in CT Images Reconstructed with Iterative Reconstruction: A Phantom Study.
    Jensen K; Andersen HK; Smedby Ö; Østerås BH; Aarsnes A; Tingberg A; Fosse E; Martinsen AC
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):509-518. PubMed ID: 29198945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study.
    Thompson JD; Chakraborty DP; Szczepura K; Tootell AK; Vamvakas I; Manning DJ; Hogg P
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1265-74. PubMed ID: 26936711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
    Seki S; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
    Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods.
    Wu R; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Fukui H; Ota T; Nishida T; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation dose reduction in cardiovascular CT angiography with iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D) in a swine model: a model of paediatric cardiac imaging.
    Zhao P; Hou Y; Liu Q; Ma Y; Guo Q
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jul; 71(7):716.e7-716.e14. PubMed ID: 27180082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iterative Image Reconstruction Improves the Accuracy of Automated Plaque Burden Assessment in Coronary CT Angiography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound.
    Puchner SB; Ferencik M; Maehara A; Stolzmann P; Ma S; Do S; Kauczor HU; Mintz GS; Hoffmann U; Schlett CL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):777-784. PubMed ID: 28177655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Different Levels of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D on Image Quality of 320-Row Coronary CT Angiography: A Clinical Trial.
    Feger S; Rief M; Zimmermann E; Martus P; Schuijf JD; Blobel J; Richter F; Dewey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125943. PubMed ID: 25945924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.